Revelation X^2

From: glassgnost <dahackerSPAMBLOCKED@socal.rr.com>
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.religion.gnostic
Date: Fri, Oct 18, 2002 4:59 AM

The Nag Hammadi texts are consistent about arguing that the
fire-n-brimstone JHVH-1 is the "blind one", Samael. To consider, however,
that Samael's condition would account for our error(s) leads me to only
one conclusion at present: Our FIRST error was in presuming that Samael
was someone else.

We are *all* "fallen angels". The great spiritual touchstones through the
ages have delivered a consistent message as well: We all have the
capacity to pull out of it, heal and grow up. We are all the prodigal
son. We can all reconnect. Imagine an world full of Bhuddhas, etc...

Physician, heal thyself!

--
Mystical Reverend Doktor glassgnost, Minister of Unnatural Selection
-- dlindner (at) socal (dot) rr (dot) com --
Eternal Salvation or Triple Your Money Back!
http://www.subgenius.com ...or kill me!

perfect guest:
One who makes his host feel at home.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: nenslo <nenslo@yahooX.com>

glassgnost wrote:
>
>
>
> As a side note: When the Mighty Sir Lancelot discovered that he was
> fighting himself, what did he do? He fell into the lesser aspects of the
> hero, became an unthinking trigger-happy fool and went off on a
> self-destructive binge. Had he dropped his sword and embraced himself,
> Camelot might never have fallen.

If a thing that happened hadn't happened, then another thing that
happened wouldn't have happened. BUT IT DID. All imaginary things are equal.

May I respectfully request that you go embrace yourself? Thank you!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: nenslo <nenslo@yahooX.com>

glassgnost wrote:
>
> The Nag Hammadi texts are consistent about arguing that the
> fire-n-brimstone JHVH-1 is the "blind one", Samael. To consider, however,
> that Samael's condition would account for our error(s) leads me to only
> one conclusion at present: Our FIRST error was in presuming that Samael
> was someone else.

Our first error was in presuming that everything wasn't everything
else. OUr second error was making up so many names for things.
>
> We are *all* "fallen angels". The great spiritual touchstones through the
> ages have delivered a consistent message as well: We all have the
> capacity to pull out of it, heal and grow up. We are all the prodigal
> son. We can all reconnect. Imagine an world full of Bhuddhas, etc...
>

Imagine a ruler that only measures inch number twelve.

> Physician, heal thyself!
>

Smash Authoritarianism!

Back to document index

Original file name: Revelation X^2.txt.txt - converted on Monday, 21 July 2003, 13:47