United Nations to Oversee American Elections!

From: Artemia Salina <y2k@sheayright.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 2, 2004 1:56 PM

Just like the Banana Republic that we are, the United Nations
will be stepping in to ensure that our presidential elections
are conducted with as little taint as possible:

http://tinyurl.com/2trps

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Cardinal Vertigo <vertigo@alexandria.cc>

Artemia Salina wrote:
> Just like the Banana Republic that we are, the United Nations
> will be stepping in to ensure that our presidential elections
> are conducted with as little taint as possible:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2trps

Good. We obviously need it.

--
"Look, there is one statement that bothers me more than anything else,
and that's the idea that when the troops are in combat everybody has
to shut up. Imagine if we put troops in combat with a faulty rifle,
and that rifle was malfunctioning and troops were dying as a result.
I can't think anyone would allow that to happen, that would not speak
up. Well, what's the difference between a faulty plan and strategy
that's getting just as many troops killed?"
- Gen. Anthony Zinni, USMC (Ret.), former CENTCOM C-in-C, 21 May 2004

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Joe Cosby <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl>

Artemia Salina <y2k@sheayright.com> wrote:
>Just like the Banana Republic that we are, the United Nations
>will be stepping in to ensure that our presidential elections
>are conducted with as little taint as possible:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2trps

Kinda funny while we're in Iraq fighting for democracy.

--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.com/
"Oh, you are SO BANISHED!"
- Ned Flanders as God

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Artemia Salina <y2k@sheayright.com>

Joe Cosby wrote:
> Kinda funny while we're in Iraq fighting for democracy.

I think it's "kinda" "funny" "while" "we're" "in" "Iraq" "fighting"
"for" "democracy". If you know what I mean.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Joe Cosby <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl>

Artemia Salina <y2k@sheayright.com> wrote:
>Joe Cosby wrote:
>> Kinda funny while we're in Iraq fighting for democracy.
>
>I think it's "kinda" "funny" "while" "we're" "in" "Iraq" "fighting"
>"for" "democracy". If you know what I mean.

MOM MAKE HIM STOP DOING THAT!

--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.com/
"What time is it?"
"I don't know, it keeps changing."

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "nu-monet v6.0" <nothing@succeeds.com>

Artemia Salina wrote:
> Just like the Banana Republic that we are,
> the United Nations will be stepping in to
> ensure that our presidential elections
> are conducted with as little taint as
> possible:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2trps

Not exactly. Seven agitator representatives
have *asked* to UN to come in. To which, the
UN will promptly respond "no", for the following
reasons:

1) The UN cannot oversee elections in any country
that does not formally request their presence, *and*
have that presence approved by the Security Council.

2) While it is called a "federal" election, the
elections are conducted by the individual States,
as is their prerogative unless the federal government
decides they are violating voters rights. At which
point the federal government may step in. Otherwise,
despite diplomatic immunity, *any* UN employee who
so much as enters a polling place can be arrested by
the State of Florida on the felony State charge of
"interfering with an election", which would be a
clear violation of his diplomatic status.

3) This includes actions taken after the vote,
which are under the jurisdiction of the Secretary
of State of Florida. The democratic party of FL
could not even issue party credentials to observers,
as the Sec't of State could refuse those credentials.

--
"Mars was destroyed with weapons from the future.
There, does that make you feel any better?"
-- nu-monet

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Cardinal Vertigo <vertigo@alexandria.cc>

nu-monet v6.0 wrote:
> Artemia Salina wrote:
>
>>Just like the Banana Republic that we are,
>>the United Nations will be stepping in to
>>ensure that our presidential elections
>>are conducted with as little taint as
>>possible:
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/2trps
>
>
> Not exactly. Seven agitator representatives
> have *asked* to UN to come in. To which, the
> UN will promptly respond "no", for the following
> reasons:
[snip]

Too bad, we obviously need it.

--
"Look, there is one statement that bothers me more than anything else,
and that's the idea that when the troops are in combat everybody has
to shut up. Imagine if we put troops in combat with a faulty rifle,
and that rifle was malfunctioning and troops were dying as a result.
I can't think anyone would allow that to happen, that would not speak
up. Well, what's the difference between a faulty plan and strategy
that's getting just as many troops killed?"
- Gen. Anthony Zinni, USMC (Ret.), former CENTCOM C-in-C, 21 May 2004

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "ghost" <ghost@ghost.net>

"Artemia Salina" <y2k@sheayright.com> wrote:
> Just like the Banana Republic that we are, the United Nations
> will be stepping in to ensure that our presidential elections
> are conducted with as little taint as possible:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2trps

Umm... good idea, but..

To paraphrase St Graham Chapman; "What are they going to do, BLEED on us?"


Up one level
Back to document index

Original file name: United Nations to Ov#1AD196.txt - converted on Saturday, 25 September 2004, 02:05

This page was created using TextToHTML. TextToHTML is a free software for Macintosh and is (c) 1995,1996 by Kris Coppieters