Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:12:18 -0800
--------
On 28 Dec 2004 17:06:40 GMT, dblspace@aol.complex-sex (David Langlois
--- Ball serves Baal) wrote:
>What does that make inner space?
moist and squishy.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Jetzt bin ich leicht,
jetzt fliege ich,
jetzt sehe ich mich unter mir,
jetzt tanzt ein Gott durch mich.
~Nietzsche
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:23:27 -0800
--------
On 28 Dec 2004 16:54:04 GMT, kdetal@aol.com (kdetal) wrote:
>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>Doesn't this make it God?
why is space, space?
why isn't brightness, or smell, space? or color? or emotion?
we used to think time wasn't space, but now time is space, another
dimension of space which our brains don't process as space. how can
any dimension not be a kind of space?
A worse question, why are any two things in space connected? It
really doesn't make sense. An atom flying through space collides with
another atom and they ricochet away from each other. Why is the atom
after the collision connected to the atom before the collision? Why,
for that matter, are the two atoms "connected" at all? We think of
them both as being "in space", but outside of the mind, what does that
mean?
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
When stealing penises is outlawed, only outlaws will steal penises.
Correspondent:: kdetal@aol.com (kdetal)
Date: 28 Dec 2004 17:40:25 GMT
--------
>>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>>Doesn't this make it God?
>
>why is space, space?
>
>why isn't brightness, or smell, space? or color? or emotion?
Subcategories already within space.
>we used to think time wasn't space, but now time is space, another
>dimension of space which our brains don't process as space. how can
>any dimension not be a kind of space?
Which is why Space is God.
>A worse question, why are any two things in space connected? It
>really doesn't make sense. An atom flying through space collides with
>another atom and they ricochet away from each other. Why is the atom
>after the collision connected to the atom before the collision? Why,
>for that matter, are the two atoms "connected" at all? We think of
>them both as being "in space", but outside of the mind, what does that
>mean?
Look at it differently. The atoms are already both "space". Just seemingly
breaks in space (space marks) to our perception. "In space" is wrong.
"In" space implies distinct *from* space, (rather than *of* space).
They were never *not* connected.
--
I do what I want. This is why I always win.
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:09:14 -0800
--------
On 28 Dec 2004 17:40:25 GMT, kdetal@aol.com (kdetal) wrote:
>>>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>>>Doesn't this make it God?
>>
>>why is space, space?
>>
>>why isn't brightness, or smell, space? or color? or emotion?
>
>Subcategories already within space.
>
>>we used to think time wasn't space, but now time is space, another
>>dimension of space which our brains don't process as space. how can
>>any dimension not be a kind of space?
>
>Which is why Space is God.
>
>>A worse question, why are any two things in space connected? It
>>really doesn't make sense. An atom flying through space collides with
>>another atom and they ricochet away from each other. Why is the atom
>>after the collision connected to the atom before the collision? Why,
>>for that matter, are the two atoms "connected" at all? We think of
>>them both as being "in space", but outside of the mind, what does that
>>mean?
>
>Look at it differently. The atoms are already both "space". Just seemingly
>breaks in space (space marks) to our perception. "In space" is wrong.
>"In" space implies distinct *from* space, (rather than *of* space).
>
>They were never *not* connected.
folds of space in space
but maybe that's what everything is, space folding on space. Colors,
smells, feelings. Have you read David Bohm?
If you are going to talk about God though, I think two things are
implied:
1. a kind of volition
You could say "atoms are God, because everything is made of atoms",
but that wouldn't be convincing, because atoms are not thought of as
having volition. They just bounce around and stick to things and get
stuck to the bottom of your shoes.
2. a kind of unity
Likewise "atoms", or any plural, don't seem to fit the idea of God
God is and does, we imagine something like that with the word "God".
And yet space is existence. Nothing exists that doesn't exist in
space, and nothing is in space which isn't of space.
But space doesn't exist without mind. There are no "two things in
space" without mind; was what I was trying to get at.
Mind is in space but space is in mind.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"Rev." Falwell Opens Mouth, Inserts Entire Leg
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:24:42 GMT
--------
>On 28 Dec 2004 17:40:25 GMT, kdetal@aol.com (kdetal) wrote:
>
>>>>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>>>>Doesn't this make it God?
>>>
>>>why is space, space?
>>>
>>>why isn't brightness, or smell, space? or color? or emotion?
>>
>>Subcategories already within space.
>>
>>>we used to think time wasn't space, but now time is space, another
>>>dimension of space which our brains don't process as space. how can
>>>any dimension not be a kind of space?
>>
>>Which is why Space is God.
>>
>>>A worse question, why are any two things in space connected? It
>>>really doesn't make sense. An atom flying through space collides with
>>>another atom and they ricochet away from each other. Why is the atom
>>>after the collision connected to the atom before the collision? Why,
>>>for that matter, are the two atoms "connected" at all? We think of
>>>them both as being "in space", but outside of the mind, what does that
>>>mean?
>>
>>Look at it differently. The atoms are already both "space". Just seemingly
>>breaks in space (space marks) to our perception. "In space" is wrong.
>>"In" space implies distinct *from* space, (rather than *of* space).
>>
>>They were never *not* connected.
>
>folds of space in space
>
>but maybe that's what everything is, space folding on space. Colors,
>smells, feelings. Have you read David Bohm?
>
>If you are going to talk about God though, I think two things are
>implied:
>
>1. a kind of volition
>
>You could say "atoms are God, because everything is made of atoms",
>but that wouldn't be convincing, because atoms are not thought of as
>having volition. They just bounce around and stick to things and get
>stuck to the bottom of your shoes.
>
>2. a kind of unity
>
>Likewise "atoms", or any plural, don't seem to fit the idea of God
>
>God is and does, we imagine something like that with the word "God".
>
>And yet space is existence. Nothing exists that doesn't exist in
>space, and nothing is in space which isn't of space.
>
>But space doesn't exist without mind. There are no "two things in
>space" without mind; was what I was trying to get at.
>
>Mind is in space but space is in mind.
>
>
Atoms have perfect logic.
You are made of atoms.
Yet, you do not have perfect logic.
Ponder that for a while.
Correspondent:: "Kevin Cunningham" Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:40:53 GMT
--------
; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
news:_piAd.1179985$Gx4.434438@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >On 28 Dec 2004 17:40:25 GMT, kdetal@aol.com (kdetal) wrote:
>>
>>>>>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>>>>>Doesn't this make it God?
>>>>
>>>>why is space, space?
>>>>
>>>>why isn't brightness, or smell, space? or color? or emotion?
>>>
>>>Subcategories already within space.
>>>
>>>>we used to think time wasn't space, but now time is space, another
>>>>dimension of space which our brains don't process as space. how can
>>>>any dimension not be a kind of space?
>>>
>>>Which is why Space is God.
>>>
>>>>A worse question, why are any two things in space connected? It
>>>>really doesn't make sense. An atom flying through space collides with
>>>>another atom and they ricochet away from each other. Why is the atom
>>>>after the collision connected to the atom before the collision? Why,
>>>>for that matter, are the two atoms "connected" at all? We think of
>>>>them both as being "in space", but outside of the mind, what does that
>>>>mean?
>>>
>>>Look at it differently. The atoms are already both "space". Just
>>>seemingly
>>>breaks in space (space marks) to our perception. "In space" is wrong.
>>>"In" space implies distinct *from* space, (rather than *of* space).
>>>
>>>They were never *not* connected.
>>
>>folds of space in space
>>
>>but maybe that's what everything is, space folding on space. Colors,
>>smells, feelings. Have you read David Bohm?
>>
>>If you are going to talk about God though, I think two things are
>>implied:
>>
>>1. a kind of volition
>>
>>You could say "atoms are God, because everything is made of atoms",
>>but that wouldn't be convincing, because atoms are not thought of as
>>having volition. They just bounce around and stick to things and get
>>stuck to the bottom of your shoes.
>>
>>2. a kind of unity
>>
>>Likewise "atoms", or any plural, don't seem to fit the idea of God
>>
>>God is and does, we imagine something like that with the word "God".
>>
>>And yet space is existence. Nothing exists that doesn't exist in
>>space, and nothing is in space which isn't of space.
>>
>>But space doesn't exist without mind. There are no "two things in
>>space" without mind; was what I was trying to get at.
>>
>>Mind is in space but space is in mind.
>>
>>
>
> Atoms have perfect logic.
> You are made of atoms.
> Yet, you do not have perfect logic.
>
> Ponder that for a while.
>
Atoms aren't all that small. Everything is probably made of strings
although these are to small to detect so screw 'em.
Rev. Dr. Junior Mints
Anti-Pope of Atlanta
Correspondent:: mshotz@aol.commonkeypo (Rev. Richard Skull)
Date: 29 Dec 2004 23:53:28 GMT
--------
>; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
>news:_piAd.1179985$Gx4.434438@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> >On 28 Dec 2004 17:40:25 GMT, kdetal@aol.com (kdetal) wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>>>>>>Doesn't this make it God?
>>>>>
>>>>>why is space, space?
>>>>>
>>>>>why isn't brightness, or smell, space? or color? or emotion?
>>>>
>>>>Subcategories already within space.
>>>>
>>>>>we used to think time wasn't space, but now time is space, another
>>>>>dimension of space which our brains don't process as space. how can
>>>>>any dimension not be a kind of space?
>>>>
>>>>Which is why Space is God.
>>>>
>>>>>A worse question, why are any two things in space connected? It
>>>>>really doesn't make sense. An atom flying through space collides with
>>>>>another atom and they ricochet away from each other. Why is the atom
>>>>>after the collision connected to the atom before the collision? Why,
>>>>>for that matter, are the two atoms "connected" at all? We think of
>>>>>them both as being "in space", but outside of the mind, what does that
>>>>>mean?
>>>>
>>>>Look at it differently. The atoms are already both "space". Just
>>>>seemingly
>>>>breaks in space (space marks) to our perception. "In space" is wrong.
>>>>"In" space implies distinct *from* space, (rather than *of* space).
>>>>
>>>>They were never *not* connected.
>>>
>>>folds of space in space
>>>
>>>but maybe that's what everything is, space folding on space. Colors,
>>>smells, feelings. Have you read David Bohm?
>>>
>>>If you are going to talk about God though, I think two things are
>>>implied:
>>>
>>>1. a kind of volition
>>>
>>>You could say "atoms are God, because everything is made of atoms",
>>>but that wouldn't be convincing, because atoms are not thought of as
>>>having volition. They just bounce around and stick to things and get
>>>stuck to the bottom of your shoes.
>>>
>>>2. a kind of unity
>>>
>>>Likewise "atoms", or any plural, don't seem to fit the idea of God
>>>
>>>God is and does, we imagine something like that with the word "God".
>>>
>>>And yet space is existence. Nothing exists that doesn't exist in
>>>space, and nothing is in space which isn't of space.
>>>
>>>But space doesn't exist without mind. There are no "two things in
>>>space" without mind; was what I was trying to get at.
>>>
>>>Mind is in space but space is in mind.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Atoms have perfect logic.
>> You are made of atoms.
>> Yet, you do not have perfect logic.
>>
>> Ponder that for a while.
>>
>Atoms aren't all that small. Everything is probably made of strings
>although these are to small to detect so screw 'em.
Pull the Strings!
Funny, NOVA last night had three full hurs on String theory. Too bad I could
not stay up to see it all.
MSHOTZ: The Post Post Modern Man
"War hath no Fury like a non-combatants"
Charles E. Montague
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:01:36 GMT
--------
mshotz wrote:
>>; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
>>news:_piAd.1179985$Gx4.434438@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>> >On 28 Dec 2004 17:40:25 GMT, kdetal@aol.com (kdetal) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>>>>>>>Doesn't this make it God?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>why is space, space?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>why isn't brightness, or smell, space? or color? or emotion?
>>>>>
>>>>>Subcategories already within space.
>>>>>
>>>>>>we used to think time wasn't space, but now time is space, another
>>>>>>dimension of space which our brains don't process as space. how can
>>>>>>any dimension not be a kind of space?
>>>>>
>>>>>Which is why Space is God.
>>>>>
>>>>>>A worse question, why are any two things in space connected? It
>>>>>>really doesn't make sense. An atom flying through space collides with
>>>>>>another atom and they ricochet away from each other. Why is the atom
>>>>>>after the collision connected to the atom before the collision? Why,
>>>>>>for that matter, are the two atoms "connected" at all? We think of
>>>>>>them both as being "in space", but outside of the mind, what does that
>>>>>>mean?
>>>>>
>>>>>Look at it differently. The atoms are already both "space". Just
>>>>>seemingly
>>>>>breaks in space (space marks) to our perception. "In space" is wrong.
>>>>>"In" space implies distinct *from* space, (rather than *of* space).
>>>>>
>>>>>They were never *not* connected.
>>>>
>>>>folds of space in space
>>>>
>>>>but maybe that's what everything is, space folding on space. Colors,
>>>>smells, feelings. Have you read David Bohm?
>>>>
>>>>If you are going to talk about God though, I think two things are
>>>>implied:
>>>>
>>>>1. a kind of volition
>>>>
>>>>You could say "atoms are God, because everything is made of atoms",
>>>>but that wouldn't be convincing, because atoms are not thought of as
>>>>having volition. They just bounce around and stick to things and get
>>>>stuck to the bottom of your shoes.
>>>>
>>>>2. a kind of unity
>>>>
>>>>Likewise "atoms", or any plural, don't seem to fit the idea of God
>>>>
>>>>God is and does, we imagine something like that with the word "God".
>>>>
>>>>And yet space is existence. Nothing exists that doesn't exist in
>>>>space, and nothing is in space which isn't of space.
>>>>
>>>>But space doesn't exist without mind. There are no "two things in
>>>>space" without mind; was what I was trying to get at.
>>>>
>>>>Mind is in space but space is in mind.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Atoms have perfect logic.
>>> You are made of atoms.
>>> Yet, you do not have perfect logic.
>>>
>>> Ponder that for a while.
>>>
>>Atoms aren't all that small. Everything is probably made of strings
>>although these are to small to detect so screw 'em.
>
>Pull the Strings!
>
Yes! Pull the strings! Tie knots! Crochet doilies! Knit mittens!
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:11:04 -0800
--------
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:09:14 -0800, Zapanaz
wrote:
>And yet space is existence. Nothing exists that doesn't exist in
>space, and nothing is in space which isn't of space.
>
>But space doesn't exist without mind. There are no "two things in
>space" without mind; was what I was trying to get at.
>
>Mind is in space but space is in mind.
we're inside out and the universe is our innards.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
God is dead,
Long live the Superman!
- Nietzsche
Correspondent:: HellPope Huey Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:09:48 GMT
--------
In article ,
Zapanaz wrote:
> we're inside out and the universe is our innards.
My Jupiter is really sore today.
--
HellPope Huey
Oh shut up, its only a chainsaw
"Straight male seeks Bush supporter
for fair, physical fight - m4m.
I would like to fight a Bush supporter to vent my anger.
If you are one & have a fiery streak, please contact me
so we can meet and physically fight.
I would like to beat the shit out of you."
- Craig's List
"I don't wanna just rain on your parade,
I wanna blow up the floats."
- "Law & Order"
Correspondent:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 29 Dec 2004 17:50:08 GMT
--------
HellPope Huey wrote in news:NoRestraint-
456998.10085729122004@news1.west.earthlink.net:
> In article ,
> Zapanaz wrote:
>
>> we're inside out and the universe is our innards.
>
> My Jupiter is really sore today.
>
If I hear ONE MORE JOKE about Uranus, I'm gonna go beltway sniper jihad.
--
The Church of Our Lady of Prepetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"If you want my delusions, you'll have to pry them from my cold,
dead hippocampus with a grapefruit spoon."
-- HellPope Huey
Correspondent:: nikolai kingsley Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:59:58 +1100
--------
> A worse question, why are any two things in space connected? It
> really doesn't make sense. An atom flying through space collides with
> another atom and they ricochet away from each other. Why is the atom
> after the collision connected to the atom before the collision?
because the filthy subatomic perverts - all of them - are swapping
gravitons constantly. like one of those cheap porn films where -
oh, never mind.
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:57:11 GMT
--------
kdetal wrote:
>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>Doesn't this make it God?
That's what some physicists think, or rather that space is 99% nothing
and 1% energy/matter which is the God part. I've tried to argue this perspective
with the nomadic Mormon mishies but it just seems to annoy them.
The Dance of Light--
Correspondent:: "nu-monet v7.0" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:47:58 -0700
--------
kdetal wrote:
>
> Isn't Space omnipresent?
> Doesn't this make it God?
Most of the energy in space is dark matter,
which has yet to be detected in this space.
Since the majority of the energy of space
isn't even *in* space, then it is not
omnipresent.
As far as the space which has very little
energy, it and Time are two facets of the
same thing, though they are different from
the energy they contain.
And, while time-space may be omnipresent, it
is also *relative* to the energy it contains.
This would meant that time-space is
compartmentalized.
It is yet to be determined if time-space is
relative to dark matter, too. If so, then
empty time-space is transcendental, if not,
then energy, both "real" and dark are
transcendental.
But only if real energy can become dark and
visa versa.
Otherwise, there are at least two gods.
--
Unless there is some reason for investigation,
the federal law and the Constitution still
protect the rights of citizens.
--FBI agent Greg Stejskal
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:58:15 GMT
--------
"nu-monet v7.0" wrote:
>kdetal wrote:
>>
>> Isn't Space omnipresent?
>> Doesn't this make it God?
>
>Most of the energy in space is dark matter,
>which has yet to be detected in this space.
>Since the majority of the energy of space
>isn't even *in* space, then it is not
>omnipresent.
>
>As far as the space which has very little
>energy, it and Time are two facets of the
>same thing, though they are different from
>the energy they contain.
>
>And, while time-space may be omnipresent, it
>is also *relative* to the energy it contains.
>This would meant that time-space is
>compartmentalized.
>
>It is yet to be determined if time-space is
>relative to dark matter, too. If so, then
>empty time-space is transcendental, if not,
>then energy, both "real" and dark are
>transcendental.
>
>But only if real energy can become dark and
>visa versa.
>
>Otherwise, there are at least two gods.
>
I think that Time is an invention of Man,
just to get a handle on matter in motion.
The motion of matter is how people
measure time, and time doesn't exist
as a thing in itself.
If I could put time in a bottle?
It'll never happen!
Time is that dark figure in the hooded robe with a scythe.
--------
; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
news:b1iAd.1179862$Gx4.44069@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> I think that Time is an invention of Man,
> just to get a handle on matter in motion.
> The motion of matter is how people
> measure time, and time doesn't exist
> as a thing in itself.
I used to think that. Then I GREW THE FUCK UP. How can time be INVENTED??
WHERE ARE THE FACTORIES?? Do you have a TIME FACTORY in YOUR town???? Is
there a stock price for TIME on the NYSE??? Have you EVER been left TIME in
YOUR XMAS STOCKING??? OOH, right, KOREA makes it. It was "invented" by
wealthy New York shipping magnates in the 1800's, and then the manufacturing
process was streamlined and shipped to the third world for mass production,
would THAT BE what HAPPENED? Somewhere in PyongYang there's a massive
redbrick factory from before the revolution, where millions of Asians sit
and jerk off the TIME ROBOT, which squirts out lots of steamy sticky TIME by
the MILLENIUM every TEN FEET where it /transmission
ended
Ya, I agree with you though, nothing is time....there isn't anything that
you can point to and call time. There aren't any effects that you can point
to and say, that happens because of time.....oh wait, yes there are. I don't
coexist with JFK, Al Jolson, Rasputin, your great granddaughter and the
Toasted SunFishCat People of 99211(x). I'm not on Planet X AND on Earth
right now, even though both are realities, one eventual, one present. Then
there's time dilation, which I gather has been proven to occur, where the
amount of time experienced by the experiencer will decrease with speed
relative to an observer. But maybe the effect is due to a thing we only
think is time, but isn't. Bah, what am I saying, it's a mathematical entity,
nothing more.
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:32:18 -0800
--------
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:12:50 -0500, "fenian d'illudium q-36, Rlari."
wrote:
>Ya, I agree with you though, nothing is time....there isn't anything that
>you can point to and call time.
entropy.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
DOWN WITH AHMAD CHALABI, MAN OF CATS!
Correspondent:: "Doktor Dark" Date: 28 Dec 2004 16:38:44 -0800
--------
time = observable sequential reality progression/evolution or
discernable change
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:07:49 GMT
Ok, fine. Absolute zero temp, everything stops. Maybe, things get so
slow that they hardly seem to move at all, or they can go so fast that
they appear to have arrived before they're left.
If one can measure time, how long is it? How much does it weigh?
Is a pound of time lighter than a pound of feathers?
Correspondent:: "ArWeGod" Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:42:36 GMT
--------
; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
news:FrnAd.42920$uM5.40142@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> "Doktor Dark" wrought:
> >time = observable sequential reality progression/evolution or
> >discernable change
> >
>
> Ok, fine. Absolute zero temp, everything stops. Maybe, things get so
> slow that they hardly seem to move at all, or they can go so fast that
> they appear to have arrived before they're left.
>
> If one can measure time, how long is it? How much does it weigh?
> Is a pound of time lighter than a pound of feathers?
>
>
And how much time is gravity? How fast does it move? Can one put a beam
of it in a tube and run it off batteries?
--
ArWePuzzled
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:52:37 GMT
--------
"ArWeGod" wrote:
>; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
>news:FrnAd.42920$uM5.40142@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> "Doktor Dark" wrought:
>> >time = observable sequential reality progression/evolution or
>> >discernable change
>> >
>>
>> Ok, fine. Absolute zero temp, everything stops. Maybe, things get so
>> slow that they hardly seem to move at all, or they can go so fast that
>> they appear to have arrived before they're left.
>>
>> If one can measure time, how long is it? How much does it weigh?
>> Is a pound of time lighter than a pound of feathers?
>>
>>
>And how much time is gravity? How fast does it move? Can one put a beam
>of it in a tube and run it off batteries?
>
Maybe so, Rubin had a train
And he run it off the track
Run it to the Lord knows where
And it's Oh, me
Oh, Lordy my
Run it to the Lord knows where
Heard the hobo sayin' to the bum
If you got some cocaine gimme some
I believe Great Gawd I'm a-comin' down
Correspondent:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 29 Dec 2004 12:58:19 GMT
--------
König Prüß, GfbAEV wrote in
news:FrnAd.42920$uM5.40142@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> "Doktor Dark" wrought:
>>time = observable sequential reality progression/evolution or
>>discernable change
>>
>
> Ok, fine. Absolute zero temp, everything stops. Maybe, things get so
> slow that they hardly seem to move at all, or they can go so fast that
> they appear to have arrived before they're left.
>
> If one can measure time, how long is it? How much does it weigh?
> Is a pound of time lighter than a pound of feathers?
>
>
>
Not sure of it's weight or length, but it's $29.95 for 56 issues.
--
The Church of Our Lady of Prepetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"If you want my delusions, you'll have to pry them from my cold,
dead hippocampus with a grapefruit spoon."
-- HellPope Huey
Correspondent:: "Doktor Dark" Date: 29 Dec 2004 05:51:50 -0800
--------
König wrote:
> "Doktor Dark" wrought:
> >time = observable sequential reality progression/evolution or
> >discernable change
> >
>
> Ok, fine. Absolute zero temp, everything stops.
But it still exists. Its continued existence being observed equals
evidence of time.
> If one can measure time, how long is it?
>From beginning to end.
>How much does it weigh?
Cannot tell for sure, but we know it does because it sometimes weighs
on our shoulders.
Correspondent:: Eddie Vroom Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:17:29 GMT
--------
Doktor Dark wrote:
> time = observable sequential reality progression/evolution or
> discernable change
You are hallucinating. It'll pass.
--
Art and Fashion for the New Conspiracy
http://www.cafepress.com/luciddragon
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor Eddie Vroom
Certified God by the holy authority of
the White Lotus Fortune Cookie Company
June 23, 2004
Correspondent:: HellPope Huey Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 05:33:43 GMT
--------
In space, no one can see your nipples stiffen.
--
HellPope Huey
That's one hell of a pickle,
Connie said to the beefy butcher.
"Who's that?"
"Oh, you wouldn't know them darling;
they're respectable."
- "After the Thin Man"
"How DARE you interfere with my literary posturing
and sully it with points of style???
The worst part is, you are correct. F**K you, sir."
- H. P. Huey
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:02:15 -0800
--------
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 05:33:43 GMT, HellPope Huey
wrote:
>
> In space, no one can see your nipples stiffen.
it sounds like "krrritch ... krrritch ... krrritch"
no really
I can hear stiffening nipples from a transcendental level.
look, stop laughing dammit.
Some people spend twenty years studying the mystical arts in order to
benefit mankind. then mankind reelects GW Bush. I am interested in
the stiffening of nipples. YOU tell ME.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Years ago in Houstone, this crazed bastard fed his 11-year-old son
poisoned Pixie Stix on Halloween, killed him and gave half the
insurance money to the Baptist church. When it was all done, he got
the needle at midnight on a Friday and as I came on the air @ KPFT
right then, I opened with "Candyman." 3 people called and were
outraged. 6 called and were laughing. RIGHT-THINKERS BEAT OUT
PUCKERBUTTS TWO TO ONE!!! PRAISE "BOB!"
- quote from: ohhhhhhh really, you don't want to know. Do you?
Correspondent:: Eddie Vroom Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:19:05 GMT
--------
Zapanaz wrote:
> look, stop laughing dammit.
>
> Some people spend twenty years studying the mystical arts in order to
> benefit mankind. then mankind reelects GW Bush.
No shit. That's why I voted in favor of Armageddon at the shardholder's
convention.
--
Art and Fashion for the New Conspiracy
http://www.cafepress.com/luciddragon
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor Eddie Vroom
Certified God by the holy authority of
the White Lotus Fortune Cookie Company
June 23, 2004
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:13:59 -0800
--------
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:19:05 GMT, Eddie Vroom
wrote:
>Zapanaz wrote:
>
>> look, stop laughing dammit.
>>
>> Some people spend twenty years studying the mystical arts in order to
>> benefit mankind. then mankind reelects GW Bush.
>
>No shit. That's why I voted in favor of Armageddon at the shardholder's
>convention.
Next year, vote in favor of stiff nipples. And they'll say "MY GOD,
THIS BOY HAS A VISION!"
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"As an American, I'm getting sick and tired of other countries."
Cris Langston
Accountant
Correspondent:: HellPope Huey Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:08:48 GMT
--------
In article ,
Zapanaz wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 05:33:43 GMT, HellPope Huey
> wrote:
>
> > In space, no one can see your nipples stiffen.
> it sounds like "krrritch ... krrritch ... krrritch"
> no really
> I can hear stiffening nipples from a transcendental level.
> look, stop laughing dammit.
> Some people spend twenty years studying the mystical arts in order to
> benefit mankind. then mankind reelects GW Bush. I am interested in
> the stiffening of nipples. YOU tell ME.
Tell you which? How to get to space or what to do in the event of
stiffening nipples? I believe those would be more Nu-Monet's and
Alliekatt's respective areas of expertise. However, I can tell you how
to sculpt a SpongeBob out of C-4 and get it into a really great place
for triggering. Blow up Pink larvae now, ask me how.
--
HellPope Huey
Oh shut up, its only a chainsaw
"Straight male seeks Bush supporter
for fair, physical fight - m4m.
I would like to fight a Bush supporter to vent my anger.
If you are one & have a fiery streak, please contact me
so we can meet and physically fight.
I would like to beat the shit out of you."
- Craig's List
"I don't wanna just rain on your parade,
I wanna blow up the floats."
- "Law & Order"
Correspondent:: "dinosaurbob" Date: 29 Dec 2004 02:41:50 -0800
--------
Eddie Vroom wrote:
> Doktor Dark wrote:
>
> > time = observable sequential reality progression/evolution or
> > discernable change
>
> You are hallucinating. It'll pass.
>
Time is just nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once.
+dinosaurbob+
Correspondent:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 29 Dec 2004 12:59:45 GMT
--------
"dinosaurbob" wrote in
news:1104316910.547974.208810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
> Eddie Vroom wrote:
>> Doktor Dark wrote:
>>
>> > time = observable sequential reality progression/evolution or
>> > discernable change
>>
>> You are hallucinating. It'll pass.
>>
>
>
> Time is just nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once.
> +dinosaurbob+
>
>
IT'S NOT WORKING!
--
The Church of Our Lady of Prepetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"If you want my delusions, you'll have to pry them from my cold,
dead hippocampus with a grapefruit spoon."
-- HellPope Huey
Correspondent:: mshotz@aol.commonkeypo (Rev. Richard Skull)
Date: 29 Dec 2004 23:52:13 GMT
Time= An artifical concept designed by the Conspiracy to enslave all living
things in the world.
MSHOTZ: The Post Post Modern Man
"War hath no Fury like a non-combatants"
Charles E. Montague
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:57:09 GMT
--------
"fenian d'illudium q-36, Rlari." wrote:
>; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
>news:b1iAd.1179862$Gx4.44069@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> I think that Time is an invention of Man,
>> just to get a handle on matter in motion.
>> The motion of matter is how people
>> measure time, and time doesn't exist
>> as a thing in itself.
>
>I used to think that. Then I GREW THE FUCK UP. How can time be INVENTED??
>WHERE ARE THE FACTORIES?? Do you have a TIME FACTORY in YOUR town???? Is
>there a stock price for TIME on the NYSE??? Have you EVER been left TIME in
>YOUR XMAS STOCKING??? OOH, right, KOREA makes it. It was "invented" by
>wealthy New York shipping magnates in the 1800's, and then the manufacturing
>process was streamlined and shipped to the third world for mass production,
>would THAT BE what HAPPENED? Somewhere in PyongYang there's a massive
>redbrick factory from before the revolution, where millions of Asians sit
>and jerk off the TIME ROBOT, which squirts out lots of steamy sticky TIME by
>the MILLENIUM every TEN FEET where it /transmission
>ended
>
>Ya, I agree with you though, nothing is time....there isn't anything that
>you can point to and call time. There aren't any effects that you can point
>to and say, that happens because of time.....oh wait, yes there are. I don't
>coexist with JFK, Al Jolson, Rasputin, your great granddaughter and the
>Toasted SunFishCat People of 99211(x). I'm not on Planet X AND on Earth
>right now, even though both are realities, one eventual, one present. Then
>there's time dilation, which I gather has been proven to occur, where the
>amount of time experienced by the experiencer will decrease with speed
>relative to an observer. But maybe the effect is due to a thing we only
>think is time, but isn't. Bah, what am I saying, it's a mathematical entity,
>nothing more.
>
>
`If you knew Time as well as I do,' said the Hatter, `you wouldn't talk about wasting IT.
It's HIM.'
`I don't know what you mean,' said Alice.
`Of course you don't!' the Hatter said, tossing his head contemptuously.
`I dare say you never even spoke to Time!'
`Perhaps not,' Alice cautiously replied: `but I know I have to beat time when I learn music.'
`Ah! that accounts for it,' said the Hatter. `He won't stand beating.
Now, if you only kept on good terms with him, he'd do almost anything you liked with the clock.
For instance, suppose it were nine o'clock in the morning, just time to begin lessons: you'd only
have to whisper a hint to Time, and round goes the clock in a twinkling! Half-past one, time for dinner!'
(`I only wish it was,' the March Hare said to itself in a whisper.)
`That would be grand, certainly,' said Alice thoughtfully: `but then--I shouldn't be hungry for it, you know.'
`Not at first, perhaps,' said the Hatter: `but you could keep it to half-past one as long as you liked.'
`Is that the way YOU manage?' Alice asked.
The Hatter shook his head mournfully. `Not I!' he replied. `We quarrelled last March--just before HE went mad, you know--' (pointing with his tea spoon at the March Hare,) `--it was at the great concert given by the Queen of Hearts, and I had to sing
"Twinkle, twinkle, little bat!
"The hatter broke the silence. 'What day of the month is it ?' he said, turning to Alice:
he had taken his watch out of his pocket, and was looking at it uneasily, shaking it
every now and then and holding it to his ear.
Alice considered a little, and then said, 'The fourth'
'Two days wrong!' sighed the hatter. 'I told you butter wouldn't suit the works!' he added angrily
at the March Hare.
'It was the best butter,' the March Hare meekly replied.
'Yes, but some crumbs must have got in as well,' the hatter grumbled:
'you shouldn't have put it in with the bread knife.'
The March Hare took the watch and looked at it gloomily: then he dipped it into
his cup of tea, and looked at it again: but he could think of nothing to say than his first remark,
'It was the best butter you know.'
Alice had been looking over his shoulder with some curiosity.
'What a funny watch!' she remarked. it tells the day of the month, and doesn't tell what o'clock it is!'
'Why should it?' muttered the hatter. 'Does your watch tell you what year it is?'
'Of course not,' Alice replied very readily: 'but that's because it stays the same year for such a
long time together.'
'Which is just the case with mine,' said the hatter."
Correspondent:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 29 Dec 2004 13:03:20 GMT
--------
König Prüß, GfbAEV wrote in
news:FhnAd.42893$uM5.15577@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
> "fenian d'illudium q-36, Rlari." wrote:
>>; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
>>news:b1iAd.1179862$Gx4.44069@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>> I think that Time is an invention of Man,
>>> just to get a handle on matter in motion.
>>> The motion of matter is how people
>>> measure time, and time doesn't exist
>>> as a thing in itself.
>>
>>I used to think that. Then I GREW THE FUCK UP. How can time be
>>INVENTED?? WHERE ARE THE FACTORIES?? Do you have a TIME FACTORY in YOUR
>>town???? Is there a stock price for TIME on the NYSE??? Have you EVER
>>been left TIME in YOUR XMAS STOCKING??? OOH, right, KOREA makes it. It
>>was "invented" by wealthy New York shipping magnates in the 1800's, and
>>then the manufacturing process was streamlined and shipped to the third
>>world for mass production, would THAT BE what HAPPENED? Somewhere in
>>PyongYang there's a massive redbrick factory from before the revolution,
>>where millions of Asians sit and jerk off the TIME ROBOT, which squirts
>>out lots of steamy sticky TIME by the MILLENIUM every TEN FEET where it
>> /transmission ended
>>
>>Ya, I agree with you though, nothing is time....there isn't anything
>>that you can point to and call time. There aren't any effects that you
>>can point to and say, that happens because of time.....oh wait, yes
>>there are. I don't coexist with JFK, Al Jolson, Rasputin, your great
>>granddaughter and the Toasted SunFishCat People of 99211(x). I'm not on
>>Planet X AND on Earth right now, even though both are realities, one
>>eventual, one present. Then there's time dilation, which I gather has
>>been proven to occur, where the amount of time experienced by the
>>experiencer will decrease with speed relative to an observer. But maybe
>>the effect is due to a thing we only think is time, but isn't. Bah, what
>>am I saying, it's a mathematical entity, nothing more.
>>
>>
> `If you knew Time as well as I do,' said the Hatter, `you wouldn't talk
> about wasting IT. It's HIM.'
>
> `I don't know what you mean,' said Alice.
>
> `Of course you don't!' the Hatter said, tossing his head contemptuously.
> `I dare say you never even spoke to Time!'
>
> `Perhaps not,' Alice cautiously replied: `but I know I have to beat time
> when I learn music.'
>
> `Ah! that accounts for it,' said the Hatter. `He won't stand beating.
> Now, if you only kept on good terms with him, he'd do almost anything
> you liked with the clock.
> For instance, suppose it were nine o'clock in the morning, just time to
> begin lessons: you'd only have to whisper a hint to Time, and round goes
> the clock in a twinkling! Half-past one, time for dinner!'
>
> (`I only wish it was,' the March Hare said to itself in a whisper.)
>
> `That would be grand, certainly,' said Alice thoughtfully: `but then--I
> shouldn't be hungry for it, you know.'
>
> `Not at first, perhaps,' said the Hatter: `but you could keep it to
> half-past one as long as you liked.'
>
> `Is that the way YOU manage?' Alice asked.
>
> The Hatter shook his head mournfully. `Not I!' he replied. `We
> quarrelled last March--just before HE went mad, you know--' (pointing
> with his tea spoon at the March Hare,) `--it was at the great concert
> given by the Queen of Hearts, and I had to sing
>
> "Twinkle, twinkle, little bat!
>
> "The hatter broke the silence. 'What day of the month is it ?' he said,
> turning to Alice:
> he had taken his watch out of his pocket, and was looking at it
> uneasily, shaking it every now and then and holding it to his ear.
> Alice considered a little, and then said, 'The fourth'
> 'Two days wrong!' sighed the hatter. 'I told you butter wouldn't suit
> the works!' he added angrily at the March Hare.
> 'It was the best butter,' the March Hare meekly replied.
> 'Yes, but some crumbs must have got in as well,' the hatter grumbled:
> 'you shouldn't have put it in with the bread knife.'
> The March Hare took the watch and looked at it gloomily: then he dipped
> it into his cup of tea, and looked at it again: but he could think of
> nothing to say than his first remark, 'It was the best butter you know.'
> Alice had been looking over his shoulder with some curiosity.
> 'What a funny watch!' she remarked. it tells the day of the month, and
> doesn't tell what o'clock it is!' 'Why should it?' muttered the hatter.
> 'Does your watch tell you what year it is?' 'Of course not,' Alice
> replied very readily: 'but that's because it stays the same year for
> such a long time together.'
> 'Which is just the case with mine,' said the hatter."
>
>
That sounds like a conversation I overheard at the last devival I attended.
--
The Church of Our Lady of Prepetual Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"If you want my delusions, you'll have to pry them from my cold,
dead hippocampus with a grapefruit spoon."
-- HellPope Huey
Correspondent:: Eddie Vroom Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:16:34 GMT
--------
fenian d'illudium q-36, Rlari. wrote:
> I used to think that. Then I GREW THE FUCK UP. How can time be INVENTED??
> WHERE ARE THE FACTORIES?? Do you have a TIME FACTORY in YOUR town???? Is
> there a stock price for TIME on the NYSE??? Have you EVER been left TIME in
How long have you been hanging around here? Hasn't "Bob" scheduled your
hazing ritual yet?
Hmmmm...
--
Art and Fashion for the New Conspiracy
http://www.cafepress.com/luciddragon
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor Eddie Vroom
Certified God by the holy authority of
the White Lotus Fortune Cookie Company
June 23, 2004
Correspondent:: mshotz@aol.commonkeypo (Rev. Richard Skull)
Date: 29 Dec 2004 00:27:20 GMT
--------
>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>Doesn't this make it God?
>--
No. Space is just the parts of the Universe that Walmart has not built stores
yet.
MSHOTZ: The Post Post Modern Man
"War hath no Fury like a non-combatants"
Charles E. Montague
Correspondent:: "ArWeGod" Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:45:47 GMT
--------
"Rev. Richard Skull" wrote in message
news:20041228192720.12272.00002816@mb-m28.aol.com...
> >Isn't Space omnipresent?
> >Doesn't this make it God?
>
> No. Space is just the parts of the Universe that Walmart has not built
stores
> yet.
>
There is one?
--
ArWeMartyPants
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 05:16:22 -0500
--------
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:54:04 +0000, kdetal wrote:
> Isn't Space omnipresent?
> Doesn't this make it God?
So we've been launching rockets up God's
pooper all this time? No wonder we have
huge tidal waves and shit!
Correspondent:: nenslo Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:27:17 -0800
--------
kdetal wrote:
>
> Isn't Space omnipresent?
> Doesn't this make it God?
SYLLOGISM.
Correspondent:: kdetal@aol.com (kdetal)
Date: 04 Jan 2005 22:43:04 GMT
--------
> Isn't Space omnipresent?
>> Doesn't this make it God?
>
>
>SYLLOGISM.
Space is omnipresent.
God is omnipresent.
Therefore Space is God.
Hypothetical syllogism
Modus Ponens.
--
I do what I want. This is why I always win.
Correspondent:: "nu-monet v7.0" Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:10:39 -0700
--------
kdetal wrote:
>
> > Isn't Space omnipresent?
> >> Doesn't this make it God?
> >
> >
> >SYLLOGISM.
>
> Space is omnipresent.
> God is omnipresent.
> Therefore Space is God.
>
> Hypothetical syllogism
> Modus Ponens.
Space exists as a construct of space-time.
As such it is a variable, and comparable
with different relative constructs of itself,
by using observations of the energy contained
within each subsection.
The god concept, though, is of a singularity.
It is comparable with nothing, and its smallest
subsection is identical to the whole, *as such*.
In other words, if you had god that filled the
entire universe and a subsection of god the size
of a pea, they would be identical in size, and
would still be part of the unified whole. It is
not entirely relative to space-time, much like a
3-D man in Flatland.
The singularity concept has been around since
ancient times, and philosophers have long since
figured out its parameters, for the purposes of
monotheism. Kabbalists figured out just about
everything a singularity god *has* to be.
--
"YOU BELONG TO US NOW!"
"GET DOWN WITH MY SICKNESS!!"
--Kino Beman, brand name
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:01:33 -0800
--------
On 28 Dec 2004 16:54:04 GMT, kdetal@aol.com (kdetal) wrote:
>Isn't Space omnipresent?
>Doesn't this make it God?
space, and time.
August 6, 1945 8:15 AM
Who really gave that order?
Answer
Control. The ugly American. The instrument of Control.
Question
If Control's control is absolute, why does Control need to control?
Answer
Control needs time.
Question
Is Control controlled by its need to control?
Answer
Yes
Question
Why does Control need humans, as you call them?
Wait, wait.
Time, a landing field.
Death needs time like a junkie needs junk.
And what does Death need time for?
The answer is sooo simple.
Death needs time for what it kills to grow in
for Ah Pook's sake.
Death needs time for what it kills to grow in
for Ah Pook's sweet sake,
You Stupid, Vulgar, Greedy, American death-sucker.
Death needs time for what it kills to grow in
for Ah Pook's sweet sake,
You Stupid, Vulgar, Greedy, American death-sucker.