Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 04:07:39 -0500
--------
I really really want to be cool and hip, and I'm having a hard
time deciding which side of the Hunter Thomson suicide I should
take in order to leverage my coolness quotient the most. The way I
see it I have three options here:
1: Get all sappy and wave goodbye to someone I've never met, and
probably wouldn't WANT to meet if I had a chance.
2: Snap at those who chose option #1 and deride them for being
saps over the death of one whose work could only be classified
as "nostalgic." Whose book "Hell's Angels" was so boring that
after several earnest tries I could not get beyond the first
chapter. (All of the bikers I've known have been nothing more
than violent overgrown children and cry babies who steal from
and intimidate each other like a pack of syphilitic hyenas,
and who are no more interesting than same.)
3: Silently ignore the whole thing, writing it off as the
squabbling of a pack of syphilitic hyenas.
Correspondent:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:23:04 GMT
--------
Artemia Salina wrote:
>I really really want to be cool and hip, and I'm having a hard
>time deciding which side of the Hunter Thomson suicide I should
>take in order to leverage my coolness quotient the most. The way I
>see it I have three options here:
>
>1: Get all sappy and wave goodbye to someone I've never met, and
>probably wouldn't WANT to meet if I had a chance.
>
>2: Snap at those who chose option #1 and deride them for being
>saps over the death of one whose work could only be classified
>as "nostalgic." Whose book "Hell's Angels" was so boring that
>after several earnest tries I could not get beyond the first
>chapter. (All of the bikers I've known have been nothing more
>than violent overgrown children and cry babies who steal from
>and intimidate each other like a pack of syphilitic hyenas,
>and who are no more interesting than same.)
>
>3: Silently ignore the whole thing, writing it off as the
>squabbling of a pack of syphilitic hyenas.
>
>
>Which should I choose?
>
>--
With this kind of analytical capacity, you likely don't
require any assistance with coming to a viable decision.
Correspondent:: Baldin Pramer Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:35:25 -0700
--------
Artemia Salina wrote:
> I really really want to be cool and hip, and I'm having a hard
> time deciding which side of the Hunter Thomson suicide I should
> take in order to leverage my coolness quotient the most. The way I
> see it I have three options here:
>
> 1: Get all sappy and wave goodbye to someone I've never met, and
> probably wouldn't WANT to meet if I had a chance.
>
> 2: Snap at those who chose option #1 and deride them for being
> saps over the death of one whose work could only be classified
> as "nostalgic." Whose book "Hell's Angels" was so boring that
> after several earnest tries I could not get beyond the first
> chapter. (All of the bikers I've known have been nothing more
> than violent overgrown children and cry babies who steal from
> and intimidate each other like a pack of syphilitic hyenas,
> and who are no more interesting than same.)
>
> 3: Silently ignore the whole thing, writing it off as the
> squabbling of a pack of syphilitic hyenas.
>
>
> Which should I choose?
>
The cool guys never acknowledged his death. The *really* cool guys don't
even know he died. The *really* *really* cool guys don't even know who
he is.
It is too late for you. I suggest you just do what comes naturally.
--
Sir Baldin Pramer, R.P.A.
Correspondent:: "Ad Absurdum" Date: 24 Feb 2005 18:39:34 -0800
--------
The *coolest* guys faked his suicide.
Correspondent:: "shazbot667" Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:03:18 -0500
--------
"Ad Absurdum" wrote in message
news:1109299174.143411.87050@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> The *coolest* guys faked his suicide.
>
We didn't fake it, we just didn't SUCCEED! Damn fucking vomit-inducers, I
COULD be dead, damn it!
Correspondent:: Eddie Vroom Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:46:24 GMT
--------
shazbot667 wrote:
> We didn't fake it, we just didn't SUCCEED! Damn fucking vomit-inducers, I
> COULD be dead, damn it!
Are you *sure* you would know the difference? ;)
--
How's this for a punchline: I wasn't joking, motherfucker!
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor Eddie Vroom
Certified God by the holy authority of
the White Lotus Fortune Cookie Company
June 23, 2004
Correspondent:: "shazbot667" Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 03:05:19 -0500
--------
"Eddie Vroom" wrote in message
news:4RzTd.7049$OU1.4515@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> shazbot667 wrote:
>
> > We didn't fake it, we just didn't SUCCEED! Damn fucking vomit-inducers,
I
> > COULD be dead, damn it!
>
> Are you *sure* you would know the difference? ;)
>
Given my frequent bouts of insomnia followed with double digit hours of
sleep... no, I really wouldn't. But the "living" seem to interact with me.
And I'm not wandering around the same place over and over again.
Correspondent:: "Ad Absurdum" Date: 27 Feb 2005 13:17:42 -0800
--------
> But the "living" seem to interact with me.
More and more dead people claim this!
Correspondent:: Pope Phil Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:11:07 +0000 (UTC)
--------
Artemia Salina wrote:
> I really really want to be cool and hip, and I'm having a hard
> time deciding which side of the Hunter Thomson suicide
try standing between Hunter and the gun
Correspondent:: "Rev. Richard Skull" Date: 24 Feb 2005 08:11:34 -0800
--------
>>I really really want to be cool and hip, and I'm having a hard
time deciding which side of the Hunter Thomson suicide I should
take in order to leverage my coolness quotient the most. The way I
see it I have three options here:
1: Get all sappy and wave goodbye to someone I've never met, and
probably wouldn't WANT to meet if I had a chance.
2: Snap at those who chose option #1 and deride them for being
saps over the death of one whose work could only be classified
as "nostalgic." Whose book "Hell's Angels" was so boring that
after several earnest tries I could not get beyond the first
chapter. (All of the bikers I've known have been nothing more
than violent overgrown children and cry babies who steal from
and intimidate each other like a pack of syphilitic hyenas,
and who are no more interesting than same.)
3: Silently ignore the whole thing, writing it off as the
squabbling of a pack of syphilitic hyenas.
Which should I choose? <<
Chose the path of maximum Stupidlity! That is the path the prosperity
in the world of the Pink!
Correspondent:: "Rev. ErRoR" Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:07:02 GMT
--------
In article , Artemia
Salina wrote:
> I really really want to be cool and hip, and I'm having a hard
> time deciding which side of the Hunter Thomson suicide I should
> take in order to leverage my coolness quotient the most. The way I
> see it I have three options here:
>
> 1: Get all sappy and wave goodbye to someone I've never met, and
> probably wouldn't WANT to meet if I had a chance.
>
> 2: Snap at those who chose option #1 and deride them for being
> saps over the death of one whose work could only be classified
> as "nostalgic." Whose book "Hell's Angels" was so boring that
> after several earnest tries I could not get beyond the first
> chapter. (All of the bikers I've known have been nothing more
> than violent overgrown children and cry babies who steal from
> and intimidate each other like a pack of syphilitic hyenas,
> and who are no more interesting than same.)
>
> 3: Silently ignore the whole thing, writing it off as the
> squabbling of a pack of syphilitic hyenas.
>
>
> Which should I choose?
You have selected option 4
err.
Correspondent:: joecosby@mindspring.com
Date: 24 Feb 2005 20:05:21 -0800
--------
being cool is a pretty hazy concept, but it seems to generally involve
finding somebody to be cooler -than-, and then making a good show of
being contemptuous and superior to them.
Therefore, I say you win already.
Correspondent:: nenslo Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:39:23 -0800
--------
Artemia Salina wrote:
>
> I really really want to be cool and hip, and I'm having a hard
> time deciding which side of the Hunter Thomson suicide I should
> take in order to leverage my coolness quotient the most. The way I
> see it I have three options here:
>
> 1: Get all sappy and wave goodbye to someone I've never met, and
> probably wouldn't WANT to meet if I had a chance.
>
> 2: Snap at those who chose option #1 and deride them for being
> saps over the death of one whose work could only be classified
> as "nostalgic." Whose book "Hell's Angels" was so boring that
> after several earnest tries I could not get beyond the first
> chapter. (All of the bikers I've known have been nothing more
> than violent overgrown children and cry babies who steal from
> and intimidate each other like a pack of syphilitic hyenas,
> and who are no more interesting than same.)
>
> 3: Silently ignore the whole thing, writing it off as the
> squabbling of a pack of syphilitic hyenas.
>
> Which should I choose?
>
Do what you did.
Correspondent:: Rev DJ Epoch Date: 25 Feb 2005 15:56:01 GMT
--------
Artemia Salina wrote in
news:pan.2005.02.24.09.07.38.590436@sheayright.com:
> I really really want to be cool and hip, and I'm having a hard
> time deciding which side of the Hunter Thomson suicide I should
> take in order to leverage my coolness quotient the most. The way I
> see it I have three options here:
>
> 1: Get all sappy and wave goodbye to someone I've never met, and
> probably wouldn't WANT to meet if I had a chance.
>
> 2: Snap at those who chose option #1 and deride them for being
> saps over the death of one whose work could only be classified
> as "nostalgic." Whose book "Hell's Angels" was so boring that
> after several earnest tries I could not get beyond the first
> chapter. (All of the bikers I've known have been nothing more
> than violent overgrown children and cry babies who steal from
> and intimidate each other like a pack of syphilitic hyenas,
> and who are no more interesting than same.)
>
> 3: Silently ignore the whole thing, writing it off as the
> squabbling of a pack of syphilitic hyenas.
>
>
> Which should I choose?
>
4. Go have a beer, and relax in the knowledge he at least pissed off
Richard Nixon. Too bad there's not someone like that today to give George
W. the willies.
--
12th Epochalyptic FisTempleDungeon of The Church of Our Lady of Perpetual
Motion
Cathedral, Carwash and Dancehall- Home of the Traci Lords Memorial Brothel
Rev. DJ Epoch - proprietor and janitor
Divine Southern Redneck Yeti Clench Recruitment site: http://revdjepoch.COM
"Yeah yeah. It's all fun and games until someone ingests a quantum
singularity and implodes!!"
-- DJ Epoch
"People from other countries are so goddamned foreign. I hope they stay
where they come from."
-- HellPope Huey
Correspondent:: "Ad Absurdum" Date: 25 Feb 2005 17:41:38 -0800
--------
> 4. Go have a beer, and relax in the knowledge he at least pissed off
> Richard Nixon. Too bad there's not someone like that today to give
George
> W. the willies.
I was amused that the ad campaign for 'Farenheit 911' said
"Controversy? What Controversy?" plus pictures of Moore and Bush
laughing together........ the humour in those are so vague but people
swallowed it anyway on assumption, it being rather too cynical to think
that F-911 only pretends to be controversial.
It annoys George W. Bush less to criticize him for continuing to read
the goat book than it would to ask why the Secret Service didn't rush
him out of there like it's their job to when his life is threatened.
"I cannot respect any so-called "SubGenius" who thinks that Michael
Moore is even a fraction as annoying to George W. Bush as HST was to
Nixon."
Correspondent:: König Prüße, GfbAEV Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 02:24:16 GMT
--------
"Ad Absurdum" wrote:
>
>> 4. Go have a beer, and relax in the knowledge he at least pissed off
>> Richard Nixon. Too bad there's not someone like that today to give
>George
>> W. the willies.
>
>I was amused that the ad campaign for 'Farenheit 911' said
>"Controversy? What Controversy?" plus pictures of Moore and Bush
>laughing together........ the humour in those are so vague but people
>swallowed it anyway on assumption, it being rather too cynical to think
>that F-911 only pretends to be controversial.
>
>It annoys George W. Bush less to criticize him for continuing to read
>the goat book than it would to ask why the Secret Service didn't rush
>him out of there like it's their job to when his life is threatened.
>
>"I cannot respect any so-called "SubGenius" who thinks that Michael
>Moore is even a fraction as annoying to George W. Bush as HST was to
>Nixon."
>
Yaaaaay! Cage match!
Michael Moore vs. Michael Jackson
Correspondent:: "krustymadfaker" Date: 25 Feb 2005 19:52:56 -0800
--------
>>>>Which should I choose?>>>>
Hunter would want you to decide with dynamite.
"Happiness is [DELETED FOR SECURITY REASONS]"
- The Computer
"All internal security agents please turn in your personal effects and
report to the food vats." -Paranoia R.P.G.