N. Korea Admits to Nuclear Weapons, Suspends Talks
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:42:09 GMT
--------
N. Korea Admits to Nuclear Weapons, Suspends Talks
OK, ya got nooks!
BRING IT ON!!!
I got nooks offshore and can put one
UP YO' ASS
under five minutes!
This ain't no gawdam Tokyo karoake bar where you can
put on a cowboy hat and pretend you got it goin' on!
Nothing I'd like better than to nook the whole lot of you
Rev. Moon dick-sucking gooks.
Have a nice day!
Correspondent:: "nu-monet v7.0"
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:56:08 -0700
--------
König, Prüß, GfbAEV wrote:
>
> N. Korea Admits to Nuclear Weapons, Suspends Talks
The funniest part about this is that it isn't the
US this is agitating the most, it's China.
The Norks did not ask permission of the Emperor to
build their nuke, and the Emperor is not pleased.
There is nothing that makes a vassel state more
uppity than to think that it has *power*.
It is like a slave that has a revolver, and thinks
that everybody has to do what he wants now because he
is instantly made something that has to be respected.
And what makes it worse, is that the US told China
this would happen. So China is not only annoyed,
but also embarassed.
--
Unless there is some reason for investigation,
the federal law and the Constitution still
protect the rights of citizens.
--FBI agent Greg Stejskal
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:04:34 GMT
--------
"nu-monet v7.0" wrote:
>König, Prüß, GfbAEV wrote:
>>
>> N. Korea Admits to Nuclear Weapons, Suspends Talks
>
>The funniest part about this is that it isn't the
>US this is agitating the most, it's China.
>
>The Norks did not ask permission of the Emperor to
>build their nuke, and the Emperor is not pleased.
>
>There is nothing that makes a vassel state more
>uppity than to think that it has *power*.
>
>It is like a slave that has a revolver, and thinks
>that everybody has to do what he wants now because he
>is instantly made something that has to be respected.
>
>And what makes it worse, is that the US told China
>this would happen. So China is not only annoyed,
>but also embarassed.
>
>--
Ya, ya. All of a sudden Big China has got a case of the props.
It's my uppity red-haired stepchild, N. Korea!
If Big China was to fart, N. Korea would drop dead.
Check out the human rights violations being perpetrated
in Taiwan by Big China. The Secret Association of English
Teachers in Taiwan has documented a lot of shitz about Big China
screwing unions in Taiwan. Big China saying fuck the workers?
Ha! Go fuck Mao's corpse, why don'tchya?
Plus, too; I don't care! These nooks only have a certain self-life,
and I'm going to char a good bit of SE Asia, just for old time's sake.
Correspondent:: "pieindasky"
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:39:29 -0500
--------
; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
news:SRJOd.185652$w62.30518@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> The Secret Association of English Teachers in Taiwan
http://www.geocities.com/taiwanteacher2002/index.html
Bwwwhahahahhahahaha!!!!!
If the org's name above weren't so comical their website sure is!
Pics of Che Guvera here and there, with quotings by Marx and a webpage
html that looks like it was written by an 8 year old
with a box of 20+ old crayola crayons.....
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:57:53 GMT
--------
"pieindasky" wrote:
>
>; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
>news:SRJOd.185652$w62.30518@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> The Secret Association of English Teachers in Taiwan
>
>http://www.geocities.com/taiwanteacher2002/index.html
>
>Bwwwhahahahhahahaha!!!!!
>
>If the org's name above weren't so comical their website sure is!
>Pics of Che Guvera here and there, with quotings by Marx and a webpage
>html that looks like it was written by an 8 year old
>with a box of 20+ old crayola crayons.....
>
>
>
Und zo, exactly why with a screen and a light sword to touch the screen
where the boombas will fall on the silly rice-dick's heads, I'm ready for danger,
I'm ready for anything! I'm ready to rape your 8-year old daughter with a dog's
dick! 408 bombs from 24 tubes on one boat, and there's more than one boat!
I'll kill your chickens! I'll even kill your ducks!!! I'll piss in your kim chi!!!!!!!
Believe you me!
or you can believe Mu Yi!
You pay the freight, you can call the shots.
Dirty deeds done dirt cheap!
Correspondent:: Zapanaz
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:59:25 -0800
--------
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:39:29 -0500, "pieindasky"
wrote:
>
>; "GfbAEV" wrote in message
>news:SRJOd.185652$w62.30518@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> The Secret Association of English Teachers in Taiwan
>
>http://www.geocities.com/taiwanteacher2002/index.html
>
>Bwwwhahahahhahahaha!!!!!
>
>If the org's name above weren't so comical their website sure is!
>Pics of Che Guvera here and there, with quotings by Marx and a webpage
>html that looks like it was written by an 8 year old
>with a box of 20+ old crayola crayons.....
>
>
it's kinda funny that a secret council of english teachers can't spell
"counceling"
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"Why isn't there any organization that supports heterosexual,
middle-class white men? Oh wait, that's congress."
-Spin City
Correspondent:: HellPope Huey
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:29:22 GMT
--------
You know what I like about blustery talk concerning "nukin' 'em?" I
like that those who emit it the most show no seeming recognition of a
little thing called the Jet Stream. Enough nuke-y action at the right
time and everyone gets to share the radioactive luv. Some people are
more brain-dead than a sea bass.
--
HellPope Huey
Doin' the Lindy to Hendrix
Surprised lady in restroom:
"Hey, this is for ladies only!"
Peter O'Toole, inebriated:
"And so is *this*, ma'am,
but every now and again
I have to run a little water through it."
~ "My Favorite Year"
I can't put a sentence together -
thank God I can take my clothes off.
~ Sharon Stone
Correspondent:: "nu-monet v7.0"
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:34:24 -0700
--------
HellPope Huey wrote:
>
> You know what I like about blustery talk
> concerning "nukin' 'em?" I like that those who
> emit it the most show no seeming recognition of a
> little thing called the Jet Stream. Enough nuke-y
> action at the right time and everyone gets to share
> the radioactive luv. Some people are more brain-dead
> than a sea bass.
>
That is an interesting and rarely mentioned bit about
nuclear weapons that is almost never talked about
anymore. Remember when it was first discovered and
everybody went apeshit about "strontium 90 in milk"
and it resulted in the atmospheric test ban treaty?
They made animated movies about it and it was a super
big deal, and then they just stopped talking about it.
At least one of those movies was really well made, and
they really conveyed a complex subject in an easy to
understand way. I wouldn't mind seeing it again.
Well, most of the US arsenal was converted to air
burst, rather than ground burst, to reduce fallout--
more eco-friendly, I guess--but we targeted civilian
population centers, unlike the Russians, who targeted
military targets.
But I think you have to be in the megaton range before
you need to worry about your mushroom cloud making it
to the stratosphere. The best the Norks can prolly
managed is less than 100 kt.
--
"Mars was destroyed with weapons from the future.
There, does that make you feel any better?"
-- nu-monet
Correspondent:: "Rev. Richard Skull"
Date: 10 Feb 2005 12:51:37 -0800
--------
Well, most of the US arsenal was converted to air
burst, rather than ground burst, to reduce fallout--
more eco-friendly, I guess--but we targeted civilian
population centers, unlike the Russians, who targeted
military targets.
Air bursts are more distructive then a ground burst for any bomb of
shell. Thats a basic they teach you when learning to "call for fire"
that for any "soft targets" call for air bursts". Use ground burst only
for armor or troops dug in.
When an explosion happens on the ground, the ground ends up absorbing
most of the energy and reflecting it up.
An airburst will rain the shrapnel and energy of the blast down and
have a larger radius of distruction.
And since Nuclear weapons develop such great amounts of heat and blast,
the air burst will allow the energy to spread further. Like the
differance a parachute flare make compared to a ground "trip flare"
Also both sides targeted military AND civilain targets. Major ports,
transportation hubs, etc were targeted to disprupt the enemy's ability
to move his forces to a trouble spot.
Correspondent:: "Rev. Richard Skull"
Date: 10 Feb 2005 12:44:40 -0800
--------
You know what I like about blustery talk concerning "nukin' 'em?" I
like that those who emit it the most show no seeming recognition of a
little thing called the Jet Stream. Enough nuke-y action at the right
time and everyone gets to share the radioactive luv. Some people are
more brain-dead than a sea bass.
In the 1970's China exploded a extreamly large H-Bomb in the
atmosphere. The fallout fell onto the USA and Canada. I remember
becuase the Goverment was monitoing milk and crops for contamination.
Correspondent:: "nu-monet v7.0"
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:36:53 -0700
--------
Rev. Richard Skull wrote:
>
> In the 1970's China exploded a extreamly large
> H-Bomb in the atmosphere. The fallout fell onto
> the USA and Canada. I remember becuase the
> Goverment was monitoing milk and crops for
> contamination.
Yeah, and that's the zinger. It was a HUGE deal,
and people were really freaking out about it.
I remember that the radioactive isotopes would
travel around in the jet stream over the ocean
without depositing much, but about halfway across
the US, there was something like a downward draft
in the jet stream that sent particles streaming
down towards the midwest. I was really fascinated
by it when I saw a government-produced animation
and I wish I could see it again. It was really
interesting.
But anyway, then *everybody* shut up about it.
For some reason, the whole Strontium-90 milk
contamination and the jet stream and all of it
just got neglected. Noticeable by its absence
in the debate about nuclear war.
--
"YOU BELONG TO US NOW!"
"GET DOWN WITH MY SICKNESS!!"
--Kino Beman, brand name
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:13:52 GMT
--------
"nu-monet v7.0" wrote:
>Rev. Richard Skull wrote:
>>
>> In the 1970's China exploded a extreamly large
>> H-Bomb in the atmosphere. The fallout fell onto
>> the USA and Canada. I remember becuase the
>> Goverment was monitoing milk and crops for
>> contamination.
>
>Yeah, and that's the zinger. It was a HUGE deal,
>and people were really freaking out about it.
>
>I remember that the radioactive isotopes would
>travel around in the jet stream over the ocean
>without depositing much, but about halfway across
>the US, there was something like a downward draft
>in the jet stream that sent particles streaming
>down towards the midwest. I was really fascinated
>by it when I saw a government-produced animation
>and I wish I could see it again. It was really
>interesting.
>
>But anyway, then *everybody* shut up about it.
>For some reason, the whole Strontium-90 milk
>contamination and the jet stream and all of it
>just got neglected. Noticeable by its absence
>in the debate about nuclear war.
>
>
>--
Nookiler war is good for the economy.
Correspondent:: "Rev. Richard Skull"
Date: 11 Feb 2005 11:19:30 -0800
--------
But anyway, then *everybody* shut up about it.
For some reason, the whole Strontium-90 milk
contamination and the jet stream and all of it
just got neglected. Noticeable by its absence
in the debate about nuclear war.
Even the little "fire cracker" we droped on Hiroshima sen fallout to
the us.
In 1946, some straw used as packing material on X-Ray plates (most of
the the X-rays plates in used in most hospitals were still glass in
those days) cuase all the pltes shiped form a specific plant to be
fogged.
The culprete was traced to the unranium used in the "Little Boy" bomb.
Correspondent:: Eddie Vroom
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 03:44:09 GMT
--------
HellPope Huey wrote:
> You know what I like about blustery talk concerning "nukin' 'em?" I
> like that those who emit it the most show no seeming recognition of a
> little thing called the Jet Stream. Enough nuke-y action at the right
> time and everyone gets to share the radioactive luv. Some people are
> more brain-dead than a sea bass.
I'm having such a Repo Man flashback right now.
"Everybody could stand fifty chest x-rays a year. And they ought to get
'em, too"!
--
Here's the punchline: I wasn't joking, motherfucker!
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor Eddie Vroom
Certified God by the holy authority of
the White Lotus Fortune Cookie Company
June 23, 2004
Correspondent:: "birdie tweet"
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:30:00 -0500
--------
"pieindasky" wrote in message
news:3f2fb$420b727e$d1cc582a$16272@nip.allthenewsgroups.com...
> > The Secret Association of English Teachers in Taiwan
>
> http://www.geocities.com/taiwanteacher2002/index.html
>
> Bwwwhahahahhahahaha!!!!!
Humongous 40 Inch KurdCock
By Ali Mustafa Kamran :-)
(A short object lesson in middle eastern diplomacy)
An Arab named Hasan plowed my ass, just yesterday
with his humongous 40 inch uncircumsized cock.
There was no love, and no foreplay, and the huge
hairy bastard was hard as a rock.
My head popped off, my guts fell out, but Hasan :-) just kept a-ramming.
I tried to protest, to cry, to pout, but my ass he just kept slamming.
Afterwards, when the deed was done, Hasan chuckled and was gone.
Hopped on his camel, went off a singing a happy Al Quada type song.
Leaving me in a twisted heap, needing to use the john.
I pissed myself, right there and then and cleaned off with a sock.
And wished to myself that I had never been
assraped by a humongous 40 inch Arab cock.
The End
--
I don't worry about Turks, because they are pillow biters
and love to receive a good anal pounding from an Iraqi Kurd.
Mustaffa K.J.
--
What this all has to do with Taiwan I do not have a
clue, except that it was all in all a rather funny read.
Long live the DPRK ! http://www.korea-dpr.com/
Correspondent:: "Rev. Richard Skull"
Date: 10 Feb 2005 12:42:09 -0800
--------
The funniest part about this is that it isn't the
US this is agitating the most, it's China.
The Norks did not ask permission of the Emperor to
build their nuke, and the Emperor is not pleased.
There is nothing that makes a vassel state more
uppity than to think that it has *power*.
China and North Korea have never been close since the 1960's when the
USSR and the Chicoms had their falling out. The Soviet Union was always
North Loreas primary sponser and main trading partner. Even today,
North Korea still does more bisness with the former Soviet Union then
China.
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:55:50 GMT
--------
"Rev. Richard Skull" wrote:
>The funniest part about this is that it isn't the
>US this is agitating the most, it's China.
>
>The Norks did not ask permission of the Emperor to
>build their nuke, and the Emperor is not pleased.
>
>
>There is nothing that makes a vassel state more
>uppity than to think that it has *power*.
>
>
>
"China has been North Korea's "nuclear enabler" for decades,
helping the North to procure nuclear technology and supplying
Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program with Chinese-made
equipment and materials."
>China and North Korea have never been close since the 1960's when the
>USSR and the Chicoms had their falling out. The Soviet Union was always
>North Loreas primary sponser and main trading partner. Even today,
>North Korea still does more bisness with the former Soviet Union then
>China.
>
Correspondent:: "Rev. Richard Skull"
Date: 11 Feb 2005 11:16:17 -0800
--------
China
has been North Korea's "nuclear enabler" for decades,
helping the North to procure nuclear technology and supplying
Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program with Chinese-made
equipment and materials."
Our dear Ally Pakistan has provided N. Korea with more aid then either
the Chicoms or the USSR.
The Paks gave them the equiment to prcess spent fuel rods, and the
plans for their bomb. North Korea gave them long range missiles and
some processed and unprocessed fuel rods.
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:12:40 GMT
--------
"Rev. Richard Skull" wrote:
>China
>
>
>
> has been North Korea's "nuclear enabler" for decades,
>helping the North to procure nuclear technology and supplying
>Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program with Chinese-made
>equipment and materials."
>
>Our dear Ally Pakistan has provided N. Korea with more aid then either
>the Chicoms or the USSR.
>
>The Paks gave them the equiment to prcess spent fuel rods, and the
>plans for their bomb. North Korea gave them long range missiles and
>some processed and unprocessed fuel rods.
>
I've been hoping that the Indians would get into it
with Pakistan.
Correspondent:: "Rev. Richard Skull"
Date: 11 Feb 2005 14:43:57 -0800
--------
<
with Pakistan. >>
Kind of like an open war between 7-11 and Circle K
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:58:49 GMT
--------
"Rev. Richard Skull" wrote:
><
>with Pakistan. >>
>
>Kind of like an open war between 7-11 and Circle K
>
Oh! I didn't get it at first! Too true!!!
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:34:50 GMT
--------
"Rev. Richard Skull" wrote:
>
>
>
>China and North Korea have never been close since the 1960's when the
>USSR and the Chicoms had their falling out. The Soviet Union was always
>North Loreas primary sponser and main trading partner. Even today,
>North Korea still does more bisness with the former Soviet Union then
>China.
>
"Analysts said the North Korean statement represented an open rebuke of China,
the North's closest ally, principal trading partner and primary source of food
and fuel shipments."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15421-2005Feb10.html
Regardless of what Big China says in public,
I still don't think that Korea would do this without
Big China's OK--
Correspondent:: "nu-monet v7.0"
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:21:48 -0700
--------
König, Prüß, GfbAEV wrote:
>
> Regardless of what Big China says in public,
> I still don't think that Korea would do this without
> Big China's OK--
There are some truly bizarre things at work here behind
the scenes. Whether they are a prelude to a Chinese-
Nork "spat", I really don't know.
1) The train station explosion is suspected of being
an attempted Chinese hit on Kim. Whether or not it was,
he almost certainly would have to believe it was. And
assume that the contract was still open.
2) There has been a movement in Skor and China to
rewrite a fuzzy mideval period Korean kingdom's borders.
The Chinese take is that the kingdom was actually a
Chinese province. The Skor take is that the kingdom
also owned a chunk of China, but as Korean property.
3) The Nork leadership may have completely either lost
confidence in Kim, and are looking at his three potential
weak blood successors and not liking what they see; or,
are seeing a potential conflict with China and are scared
shitless at the prospect. Or both.
4) The Chinese have moved a Corps to the border with
Nkor, as "border police". But they are regular military.
However, a single Chinese Corps isn't squat. They would
probably deploy at least 5-7 more Corps before trying
anything.
5) When the Chinese had a spat with Vietnam in 1979,
they did grab some objectives but got slaughtered by the
entrenched and battle experienced Vietnamese. They had
to declare victory after a few weeks and go home before
they lost it all. That in mind, for them to invande Nkor
would be 10 times more difficult:
a) They would have to both capture or destroy the
Nkor C&C, capture Pyongyang, *and* capture any and all
nuclear weapons, along with armed delivery systems.
This really peaks out the old degree of difficulty meter.
b) Since the vast artillery resources of Nkor are all
pointed, Maginot-line-style, at Seoul, dug into caves in
mountains that are connected by tunnels, the Nkor assumption
is war with Skor/US. If the balloon went up, a lot of their
military would probably assume they should commence attack,
but in the wrong direction. The Chinese would definitely
*not* like to get in a fight, unintentionally, with the US.
For this reason, they would have to have LOTS of secret
negotiations with the US well in advance of their invasion,
which leads to:
c) The US would not object to a Chinese invasion, but
would insist on resolving the Nkor/Skor problem permanently
as part of the agreement with China. We would possibly
offer reasonable Chinese hegemony of Korea and US withdrawl,
contingent on a lot of other things; or, that China set up
a peaceful puppet regime in the North that would be very
friendly with the South, to spend at least the next 20 years
rebuilding the North in tandem with reunification discussions.
--
"I can imagine a LOT when it comes
to unimaginable power."
-- nu-monet
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:46:55 GMT
--------
"nu-monet v7.0" wrote:
>König, Prüß, GfbAEV wrote:
>>
>> Regardless of what Big China says in public,
>> I still don't think that Korea would do this without
>> Big China's OK--
>
>There are some truly bizarre things at work here behind
>the scenes. Whether they are a prelude to a Chinese-
>Nork "spat", I really don't know.
>
>1) The train station explosion is suspected of being
>an attempted Chinese hit on Kim. Whether or not it was,
>he almost certainly would have to believe it was. And
>assume that the contract was still open.
>
>2) There has been a movement in Skor and China to
>rewrite a fuzzy mideval period Korean kingdom's borders.
>The Chinese take is that the kingdom was actually a
>Chinese province. The Skor take is that the kingdom
>also owned a chunk of China, but as Korean property.
>
>3) The Nork leadership may have completely either lost
>confidence in Kim, and are looking at his three potential
>weak blood successors and not liking what they see; or,
>are seeing a potential conflict with China and are scared
>shitless at the prospect. Or both.
>
>4) The Chinese have moved a Corps to the border with
>Nkor, as "border police". But they are regular military.
>However, a single Chinese Corps isn't squat. They would
>probably deploy at least 5-7 more Corps before trying
>anything.
>
>5) When the Chinese had a spat with Vietnam in 1979,
>they did grab some objectives but got slaughtered by the
>entrenched and battle experienced Vietnamese. They had
>to declare victory after a few weeks and go home before
>they lost it all. That in mind, for them to invande Nkor
>would be 10 times more difficult:
>
> a) They would have to both capture or destroy the
>Nkor C&C, capture Pyongyang, *and* capture any and all
>nuclear weapons, along with armed delivery systems.
>This really peaks out the old degree of difficulty meter.
>
> b) Since the vast artillery resources of Nkor are all
>pointed, Maginot-line-style, at Seoul, dug into caves in
>mountains that are connected by tunnels, the Nkor assumption
>is war with Skor/US. If the balloon went up, a lot of their
>military would probably assume they should commence attack,
>but in the wrong direction. The Chinese would definitely
>*not* like to get in a fight, unintentionally, with the US.
>For this reason, they would have to have LOTS of secret
>negotiations with the US well in advance of their invasion,
>which leads to:
>
> c) The US would not object to a Chinese invasion, but
>would insist on resolving the Nkor/Skor problem permanently
>as part of the agreement with China. We would possibly
>offer reasonable Chinese hegemony of Korea and US withdrawl,
>contingent on a lot of other things; or, that China set up
>a peaceful puppet regime in the North that would be very
>friendly with the South, to spend at least the next 20 years
>rebuilding the North in tandem with reunification discussions.
>
>
>
>--
All things to ponder.
Good thing I'm not Sec. of State, I'd give them Skor
and Taiwan in exchange for Cuba and Venezuela.
Correspondent:: "Rev. Richard Skull"
Date: 11 Feb 2005 11:32:21 -0800
--------
2) There has been a movement in Skor and China to
rewrite a fuzzy mideval period Korean kingdom's borders.
The Chinese take is that the kingdom was actually a
Chinese province. The Skor take is that the kingdom
also owned a chunk of China, but as Korean property.
This dates back to an old argument between both Koreas and China. At
one time, China ruled most of Southeast Asia. That was actually the
root cause of most of the long bloody history of that reagion from 800
years ago, through Vietnam to to a lesser extent, the present situation
in Korea.
4) The Chinese have moved a Corps to the border with
Nkor, as "border police". But they are regular military.
However, a single Chinese Corps isn't squat. They would
probably deploy at least 5-7 more Corps before trying
anything.
Despite it enormos size, the Chinese Red Army is mostly full of units
at 3/4 strength and with obsolete equipmnet. China has been wpending
money on its air & sea Power to increase their military readiness. But
only 50% to 60% of their land army is actually combat ready. Until
recently, most of the troops in the Chinese Army spent more time
working in factoried owned by the minstry of Defense. In the 1980's &
1990's, when all those cheap AK's were flooding the US at $89 or less
at Walmart and K-mart, was the work of the Chinese Defense Minstry.
They wanted to upgrade to the AK-74, but did not have the money. So
they used cheap (almost free) troop labor to rework theold weapons to
be street legel in the USA and shiped them over by the ship load. The
cash they earned helped pay for the new rifles and tanks the Chinese
built in those days.The CIA and Military intelligence knew this as far
back as 1988 or 89. But they could not convince Bush I to stop it as
his ass was owned by the NRA. Even stoping the Chinese weapon flow that
threatened the USA in the long run was too much for the NRA to take.
Correspondent:: nikolai kingsley
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:21:30 +1100
--------
> 5) When the Chinese had a spat with Vietnam in 1979,
> they did grab some objectives but got slaughtered by the
> entrenched and battle experienced Vietnamese. They had
> to declare victory after a few weeks and go home before
> they lost it all. That in mind, for them to invande Nkor
> would be 10 times more difficult:
when i consider how many people China is supposed to have, and how
abysmally low the value of human life is supposed to be there, i look at
China vs Nork and i think "Zerg rush".
Correspondent:: polar bear
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:35:03 -0800
--------
In article
, König
Prüß, GfbAEV wrote:
> N. Korea Admits to Nuclear Weapons, Suspends Talks
>
So, all those years of scraping radium
off old watch dials finally paid off!
pb