Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:28:24 GMT
--------
"Quirk" wrote:
>
> Come gather 'round people
> Wherever you roam
> And admit that the waters
> Around you have grown
> And accept it that soon
> You'll be drenched to the bone.
> If your time to you
> Is worth savin'
\
I like the old Country Joe&the Fish
"Please Don't Drop That H-Bomb on Me"
I called a radio station in Richmond, Virginia to play that,
and they played "Only the Strong Survive" instead!!!
Please don't drop that H-Bomb on me
Why don't you drop it on yourselves!
actual lyrics, and my actual sentiments
Correspondent:: "Chain Smerker"
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:14:53 GMT
--------
"Quirk" wrote in message
news:1108739948.800752.171330@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
>
>> Nenslo is currently engaged in what we call "Unmasking the False
>> Prophets," in this case, highlighting Quirk's vanity.
>
> No vanity, once again, I am not claiming to be authority on anything,
> nothing I say should be considered true just because I said it, my
> status, or my membership or non membership in anything.
>
> They are true if they are true and for no other reason.
>
> Thus, if you dispute them, present your argument.
>
> Or go ahead and keep patting each other on the back and give me endless
> opportunity to present my arguments without refutation.
>
>> > If you respected the Church of the SubGenius you would accept
> Stang's
>> > offer of a refund of your membership and never post here again.
>
>> I agree wholeheartedly with Nenslo's assessment!
>
> I respect the Church as being a funny bunch of old guys to go camping,
> that by no means that I accept their assertions without logical proof.
>
> Respect does not mean blind acceptance.
>
> It means that I think this community is worth while provoking, as
> opposed to, say, stormfront.
>
>> > Yes the kind that lets dumbasses jerk their chains for sick yux and
> then
>> > act like you are nobly battling terrible people who want to silence
> you
>> > because you are so right and good and they are bad and wrong. In
> short,
>> > a dumbass.
>
>> Succinctly put.
>
> The Irony that I've pretty much got the whole newsgroup jumping is lost
> on you. Perhaps some of the political philosophy, logic, poetry, and
> history will sink in though. Not that expect I you to admit it. Only to
> keep responding and give me more opportunities to present it.
>
>> > That's because you are reactionary and idiotic.
>
>> I second the nomination.
>
> I third that fallacy.
>
>> I feel that Quirk's vehement display of his lack of understanding has
>> prompted some especially pithy observations by the Assassinated
>> Nenmaster.
>
> I feel that my vehement display of clear understanding, as demonstrated
> by the lack of refutations of my reasoning, has prompted some
> especially desperate and shrill rationalizations by the Nenslo.
>
> But if makes you feel a little better, see it your way.
>
>> Here's a new quote for Quirk.
>
>> "This 'Quirk' guy has completely misunderstood what the Church is
>> about; his posts represent precisely the kind of shallow, vain,
>> self-absorbed thinking that's perfect for dissection and mockery." --
>> Rev. Ivan Stang, 2005
>
> Thanks Rev, it was OK when only the lesser lights where obsessed with
> me, it got better when Nenslo became obsessed with me, now you yourself
> are obsessed with me. Which will mean everyone here will read my
> responses.
>
> Maybe I can sell advertising space here and use that revenue to fund
> the Venture Communist global expansion.
>
> Of course, I understand that you would be shallow, vain and
> self-absorbed, and thus project those traits on to others, most
> comedians are, and you are good comedian. One of my favourites.
>
> I wonder if all comedians eventually think there schtick is some sort
> of esoteric cult?
>
I really do want to get involved, ITS A JOKE
Correspondent:: "Quirk"
Date: 21 Feb 2005 10:39:45 -0800
--------
Chain Smerker wrote:
> > I wonder if all comedians eventually think there schtick is some
sort
> > of esoteric cult?
> I really do want to get involved,
Who doesn't? Welcome aboard.
> ITS A JOKE?
I know. Pass it on.
Correspondent:: "Rev. ErRoR"
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:16:42 GMT
--------
In article <42126808.1464007F@yahoox.com>, nenslo
wrote:
> Quirk wrote:
> >
> >
> > If fans of Bill O'Rielly are not a pink, then the word has no meaning.
> > If racists are not pink, likewise.
>
> The word has no meaning.
>
> >
> > > Nothing MAKES you a subgenius, you either are one or you aren't. The
> > > SubGenius must have slack.
> >
> > Now I'm confused, just when you've explained to me that I am not really
> > a SubGenius, and later that I am *STILL* not a SubGenius, now you tell
> > me all I need is slack. I have no shortage of slack. So am I, or am I
> > not a SubGenius, oh great expert of us-and-them-ism.
>
> No, I did not tell you all you need is slack. I told you "the SubGenius
> must have slack." It is not possible to have a shortage of slack.
>
> "If you have to ask, then you don't know." - J. R. "Bob" Dobbs
>
>
> >
> > I am not ranking anybody. I am criticizing the things people are
> > saying. Pointing out out the pink ideas they hold. I have not
> > questioned their belonging nor their right to express their ideas.
>
> There is no such thing as a "pink" idea. Pink is not a quality. There
> are no objects of perception which are pinker than others except in the
> literal description of coloration.
>
> >
> > BTW, Bill O'Rielly, Ann Coutier and their fans are the agents of the
> > Conspiracy. Slack-fearing pinks. Why do they fear Slack? Because they
> > earn their privilege from those that want to destroy Slack. The Bosses.
>
> Slack cannot be feared. Every person in the concentration camp is a
> victim of the system, the guards as well as the prisoners. All are
> dehumanized and set in opposition to each other by a mere idea which
> could be dispelled in a moment.
>
> >
> > > "Them-ism" program which breaks people down into tiny Us groups
> > opposed
> > > to billions of other tiny Them groups, rendering Us All utterly
> > > powerless against the control of the REAL "THEM."
> >
> > Hate break it to you, but I am the one arguing *against* "Them-ism".
> > You are defending the "Themists", us in nu-monet's "us Fox TV watchers
> > are better than them Communists (KILL KILL!!!), by which I mean anybody
> > who disagrees with Ann Coutier" or even worse, KönigPruß's "us
> > members of the master race are better than them Black People and Jews."
>
> I am not defending anyone. I am correcting semantic errors. Your
> understanding of key concepts depends on your understanding of key
> words. You have invented meanings for some terms and behave as if that
> meaning is "real." You have created definitions for certain types of
> people and permitted that definition to become a pejorative term by
> which to describe anyone who resembles that type of person. (Treating
> an entire class of people as if they are all alike is what prejudice and
> discrimination is.) You have let two notable dumbasses yank your chain
> repeatedly and relentlessly and still haven't noticed that they have
> duped you into making a humiliating spectacle of your reactionary
> idiocy. You have been given the inestimable privilege of benefiting
> from the knowledge of an elder of the church of 20 years' standing and
> have responded with peevishness at not being considered an authority on
> things to which you have never given much thought before.
>
> > I am merely trying to point out that these people are wrong, and that
> > their ideas are Pink.
>
> That is your primary error. In fact, you simply disagree with these
> people and permit the fact that they have ideas which differ from yours
> to get you all riled up. There is no such thing as a pink idea.
>
> > Not that they do not belong among us. Thats your
> > game. And their's.
>
> I cannot imagine how you came to that conclusion about me short of sheer
> dumbassedness and your desire to paint people who do not share your
> convictions in the pinkest possible shade.
I just gotta repeat 'literal description of coloration'
OK I feel better now.
err.
--
"Error runs down an inclined plane, while Truth has to laboriously climb its
way up hill."
Madame Blavatsky
Correspondent:: Baldin Pramer
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:36:08 -0700
--------
nenslo wrote:
> Quirk wrote:
>
>>nenslo wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Quirk wrote:
>>
>>>>My first controversial alt.slack essay,
>>
>>>...if by "controversial" you mean BORING.
>>
>>Thanks Nenslo, your empty criticicsm is apreciated as always. All upper
>>case letters, now THAT'S convincing.
>
>
> Your brilliant sarcasm scathes like a motherfucker as usual.
>
>
>>>>Where have all the rednecks come from?
>>
>>>Those are the SUBGENIUSES.
>>
>>Sure. I guess if they paid their $30.
>
>
> The fact that you equate paying $30 dollars with being a subgenius
> demonstrates that you aren't one.
The $30 is all it takes to be saved. Stealing some slack is another think.
--
Sir Baldin Pramer, R.P.A.
Correspondent:: brthrn@dangermedia.org
Date: 13 Feb 2005 16:26:13 -0800
--------
That's just LIKE something you'd say. You GLORY HOLE loving gas station
SUCKSLUT.
Correspondent:: nenslo
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:00:49 -0800
--------
Baldin Pramer wrote:
>
> nenslo wrote:
>
> > Quirk wrote:
> >
> >>nenslo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Quirk wrote:
> >>
> >>>>My first controversial alt.slack essay,
> >>
> >>>...if by "controversial" you mean BORING.
> >>
> >>Thanks Nenslo, your empty criticicsm is apreciated as always. All upper
> >>case letters, now THAT'S convincing.
> >
> >
> > Your brilliant sarcasm scathes like a motherfucker as usual.
> >
> >
> >>>>Where have all the rednecks come from?
> >>
> >>>Those are the SUBGENIUSES.
> >>
> >>Sure. I guess if they paid their $30.
> >
> >
> > The fact that you equate paying $30 dollars with being a subgenius
> > demonstrates that you aren't one.
>
> The $30 is all it takes to be saved. Stealing some slack is another think.
>
Being a SubGenius is yet another. Thing. Any dumbass can buy a
membership. EVERY dumbass steals slack. Only a very few extra dumb
dumbasses are SubGenii.
Correspondent:: "Rev. Ivan Stang"
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:24:05 -0500
--------
In article <420FF83D.F8A6A5D1@yahoox.com>, nenslo
wrote:
> Baldin Pramer wrote:
> >
> > nenslo wrote:
> >
> > > Quirk wrote:
> > >
> > >>nenslo wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Quirk wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>>My first controversial alt.slack essay,
> > >>
> > >>>...if by "controversial" you mean BORING.
> > >>
> > >>Thanks Nenslo, your empty criticicsm is apreciated as always. All upper
> > >>case letters, now THAT'S convincing.
> > >
> > >
> > > Your brilliant sarcasm scathes like a motherfucker as usual.
> > >
> > >
> > >>>>Where have all the rednecks come from?
> > >>
> > >>>Those are the SUBGENIUSES.
> > >>
> > >>Sure. I guess if they paid their $30.
> > >
> > >
> > > The fact that you equate paying $30 dollars with being a subgenius
> > > demonstrates that you aren't one.
> >
> > The $30 is all it takes to be saved. Stealing some slack is another think.
> >
>
> Being a SubGenius is yet another. Thing. Any dumbass can buy a
> membership. EVERY dumbass steals slack. Only a very few extra dumb
> dumbasses are SubGenii.
Nenslo! I was over to the fair today, and YOUR PIG WON!
Quirk, you DID get it all completely back-asswards, and I'll happily
refund your $30 if you privately email me your address.
This has really been an enjoyable thread! In the course of it I figured
out who brthrn is... TOOK me long enough, sheesh. DUH! Only one
SubGenius uses periods that way.
To clear up a doctrinal point, the $30 DOES get ANY NINNY onto the
Escape Vessels of the Sex Goddesses, when X-Day comes. So if anybody
was holding back from ordering a Memb Pack because they thought maybe
they weren't WORTHY, PERISH THE THOUGHT! You'll get the saucer ride,
even if you're secretly the Pinkest Polly in the Parrot Cage.
You might be assigned a different kind of BUNK and BUNKMATE than, say,
Philo would get.
--
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc.
(4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected, Rev. Ivan Stang, prop.)
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
Dobbs-Approved Authorized Commercial Outreach of The Church of the SubGenius
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com PRABOB
Correspondent:: "Quirk"
Date: 15 Feb 2005 07:40:32 -0800
--------
Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
> Quirk, you DID get it all completely back-asswards, and I'll happily
> refund your $30 if you privately email me your address.
YEAH RIGHT!
As if.
The last time I privately emailed you my address, I got so may Pizzas I
had to move to stop them from coming.
I wouldn't have minded so much but PINEAPPLES DO NOT GO WITH ANCHOVIES
AND GORGONZOLA.
Damn it.
It's ok, I like my new place much better anyway.
Now I have to figure out a way to lose those 15 pounds I gained.
Tricky bastard.
> To clear up a doctrinal point, the $30 DOES get ANY NINNY onto the
> Escape Vessels of the Sex Goddesses, when X-Day comes. So if anybody
> was holding back from ordering a Memb Pack because they thought maybe
> they weren't WORTHY, PERISH THE THOUGHT! You'll get the saucer ride,
> even if you're secretly the Pinkest Polly in the Parrot Cage.
So when you said I got it assbackwords, what you meant was that I was
exactly right.
You are so dang mystical with your saying one thing and meaning
another, is it to test the flock?
Congrats to Nenslo's pig.
Correspondent:: nenslo
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:24:28 -0800
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote:
>
> Nenslo! I was over to the fair today, and YOUR PIG WON!
>
I'll thank you not to speak that way of my mother.