What the #$*! Do We Know? We Know This Movie Sucks #$*!
Correspondent:: "Rev. Ivan Stang" Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:21:17 -0500
--------
This movie "What the#$*! Do We Know", like the embarrassing "Waking
Life," is yet another example of serious map-territory confusion --
more evidence that once the more insecure dumbasses of academia start
drawing their own maps, they forget that there even IS a territory.
My snide one-line review of this movie about the nature of reality:
"Get real."
I had read several reviews of this cosmic-minded documentary, and knew
that I should probably see it for job purposes, but had a feeling that
I wouldn't like it, and sure didn't want to spend money on it.
Luckily, I was handed a good copy of it by my pal Dennis Murphy, leader
of the rival Cult of the Living Bull. Last night, Princess Wei and I
watched the whole thing. Just barely. This feel-good movie makes you
feel like you're going to vomit.
Through cute animation, AfterEffects plug-ins, psuedoscience,
simplistic philosophomoronicism, an ill-conceived plot-line about a
confused bitch on Prozak, and talking heads commentary by such
luminaries as Ramtha, the movie posits marvelous connections between
quantum physics and sappy mysticism which aren't actually there at all.
Dull-witted kids under thirteen, or older teens who have never tried
pot, might find the ideas in this movie stimulating, as might the kind
of Garfield-collecting middle aged ladies who know that quartz crystals
are really fossilized water. Personally I, and probably most SubGenii,
covered this philosophical ground on my own when I was about 8 and
then, foolishly, again when I was doing a little too much acid, and
reading lies about the paranormal, at around age 25.
It contains some of the most painful reminders in film history that, as
the old Church Rule goes, "If you don't have a sense of humor, don't
try to be funny." What kept Wei and I watching were the frequent
INADVERTENT howlers. The mumbling of hideously miscast deaf lead Marlee
Matlin unfortunately provides many examples. The grossly egomaniacal
"egolessness" of Ramtha and her co-pontificators provide many more.
There's some important business about how nice thoughts make water
molecules look pretty, just like snowflakes in fact, whereas bad
thoughts make water molecules look like lumpy pee. ("And if thoughts
can do that to water, think what they can do to YOU!") At the climax of
his most impassioned revelations, one of the favored talking heads
suddenly blows his high falution with the phrase, "it is time to move
past the mediocricy and reach for the stars." No room for mediocricy in
the SCIENTIFIC New Age. Watching these numb-nuts academics expound on
the underpinnings of reality, utilizing a comic-book understanding of
quantum physics, is a powerful reminder that New Age beliefs and
dipshit science can inflict brain damage every bit as tragically as can
chronic drug use and cable TV. Also that rich people can afford to be
even more vapidly, self-assuredly stupid than the least-schooled
poebucker.
To be fair, there was one talking head who didn't piss me off, Fred
Alan Wolf, because he alone did not appear to take any of this bullshit
very seriously.
Much of the film resembles a 1970s Electric Company segment about How
Your Brain Works, interspersed with pundits loftily restating the
obvious in as many pointless but pretty-sounding convolutions as they
can muster. An entire half of the movie, when translated into Human, is
devoted to explaining the revolutionary concept that when things happen
to you, chemicals make you have feelings inside, but then when you ACT,
it changes things OUTSIDE you. IMAGINE THAT! Now imagine how many
bloated, pretentious, preening, pointlessly complicated ways there are
to say it. "Maybe you can have good feelings instead of bad feelings if
you would get off your butt and attempt to improve your situation for
once." There, I just saved you 90 minutes of some CORNY, CORNY
preaching.
I'm sure this movie makes some people feel smart.
YIKES.
--
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc.
(4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected, Rev. Ivan Stang, prop.)
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
Dobbs-Approved Authorized Commercial Outreach of The Church of the SubGenius
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com PRABOB
Correspondent:: "nu-monet v7.0" Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:29:34 -0700
--------
Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
>
> I'm sure this movie makes some people feel smart.
I'm convinced there are a large number of people
who are utterly amazed to discover that, when
standing in the middle of a rocky desert, you
can select ANY RANDOM THREE ROCKS and make an
IMAGINARY TRIANGLE between them. Which proves,
of course, that aliens put them there, JUST SO,
so that someday, someone could make that
realization.
And they bounce around and squeal with excitement,
and found a new religion based on their profound
and singular revelation.
--
Herring communicate with each other
via a high-pitched, "raspberry"-like
sound emitted from their anuses.
These noises are not produced by
digestive gases.
-- from 'The New Scientist'
Correspondent:: Pope Phil Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:44:32 +0000 (UTC)
--------
YES.. Aliens invented triangles. They were unknown on this planet. That's why the Pyramids are
based on them
nu-monet v7.0 wrote:
> Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
>
>>I'm sure this movie makes some people feel smart.
>
>
> I'm convinced there are a large number of people
> who are utterly amazed to discover that, when
> standing in the middle of a rocky desert, you
> can select ANY RANDOM THREE ROCKS and make an
> IMAGINARY TRIANGLE between them. Which proves,
> of course, that aliens put them there, JUST SO,
> so that someday, someone could make that
> realization.
>
> And they bounce around and squeal with excitement,
> and found a new religion based on their profound
> and singular revelation.
>
Correspondent:: "iDRMRSR" Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:37:16 -0500
--------
On the other hand, Napoleon Dynamite was a real HOOT!
Thanks for rekkymending it to me, NETF|_|X had it, I seen it, and that's
that. Gosh! What a sweet movie! Dang.
PS if'n yer done with yer copy of WTF, I wouldn't mind seeing it some day
before the Xists arrive, TIA.
[*]
-----
Correspondent:: "Anachron" Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:39:47 GMT
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote in message
news:160220051021172067%stang@subgeniusNOSPUM.com...
> This movie "What the#$*! Do We Know", like the embarrassing "Waking
> Life," is yet another example of serious map-territory confusion --
> more evidence that once the more insecure dumbasses of academia start
> drawing their own maps, they forget that there even IS a territory.
At least you had the good sense to watch it on DVD and not spend good money
for theater tickets. Like you said, half the time they are using science to
explain the chemical/physiological basis for what we experience and how we
react emotionally to stimuli. The rest of the film they are suggesting a
reality based on a kind of Solipsism where we are actually influencing
reality with our amazing power to alter the world by viewing it the lens of
differing emotional response.
They can't seem to decide if we are the puppets or the puppeteers of this
world. They should have picked a position and stuck to it. As it is, I
have no idea what they were trying to tell us.
--
Rev. Anachron
Correspondent:: phy Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:46:30 GMT
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote in
news:160220051021172067%stang@subgeniusNOSPUM.com:
> This movie "What the#$*! Do We Know",
I wish it were just a movie. :(
-phy
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:53:56 -0800
--------
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:21:17 -0500, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
wrote:
>This movie "What the#$*! Do We Know", like the embarrassing "Waking
>Life," is yet another example of serious map-territory confusion --
>more evidence that once the more insecure dumbasses of academia start
>drawing their own maps, they forget that there even IS a territory.
>
>My snide one-line review of this movie about the nature of reality:
>
>"Get real."
>
>I had read several reviews of this cosmic-minded documentary, and knew
>that I should probably see it for job purposes, but had a feeling that
>I wouldn't like it, and sure didn't want to spend money on it.
>
>Luckily, I was handed a good copy of it by my pal Dennis Murphy, leader
>of the rival Cult of the Living Bull. Last night, Princess Wei and I
>watched the whole thing. Just barely. This feel-good movie makes you
>feel like you're going to vomit.
>
>Through cute animation, AfterEffects plug-ins, psuedoscience,
>simplistic philosophomoronicism, an ill-conceived plot-line about a
>confused bitch on Prozak, and talking heads commentary by such
>luminaries as Ramtha, the movie posits marvelous connections between
>quantum physics and sappy mysticism which aren't actually there at all.
>
>Dull-witted kids under thirteen, or older teens who have never tried
>pot, might find the ideas in this movie stimulating, as might the kind
>of Garfield-collecting middle aged ladies who know that quartz crystals
>are really fossilized water. Personally I, and probably most SubGenii,
>covered this philosophical ground on my own when I was about 8 and
>then, foolishly, again when I was doing a little too much acid, and
>reading lies about the paranormal, at around age 25.
>
>It contains some of the most painful reminders in film history that, as
>the old Church Rule goes, "If you don't have a sense of humor, don't
>try to be funny." What kept Wei and I watching were the frequent
>INADVERTENT howlers. The mumbling of hideously miscast deaf lead Marlee
>Matlin unfortunately provides many examples. The grossly egomaniacal
>"egolessness" of Ramtha and her co-pontificators provide many more.
>There's some important business about how nice thoughts make water
>molecules look pretty, just like snowflakes in fact, whereas bad
>thoughts make water molecules look like lumpy pee. ("And if thoughts
>can do that to water, think what they can do to YOU!") At the climax of
>his most impassioned revelations, one of the favored talking heads
>suddenly blows his high falution with the phrase, "it is time to move
>past the mediocricy and reach for the stars." No room for mediocricy in
>the SCIENTIFIC New Age. Watching these numb-nuts academics expound on
>the underpinnings of reality, utilizing a comic-book understanding of
>quantum physics, is a powerful reminder that New Age beliefs and
>dipshit science can inflict brain damage every bit as tragically as can
>chronic drug use and cable TV. Also that rich people can afford to be
>even more vapidly, self-assuredly stupid than the least-schooled
>poebucker.
>
>To be fair, there was one talking head who didn't piss me off, Fred
>Alan Wolf, because he alone did not appear to take any of this bullshit
>very seriously.
>
>Much of the film resembles a 1970s Electric Company segment about How
>Your Brain Works, interspersed with pundits loftily restating the
>obvious in as many pointless but pretty-sounding convolutions as they
>can muster. An entire half of the movie, when translated into Human, is
>devoted to explaining the revolutionary concept that when things happen
>to you, chemicals make you have feelings inside, but then when you ACT,
>it changes things OUTSIDE you. IMAGINE THAT! Now imagine how many
>bloated, pretentious, preening, pointlessly complicated ways there are
>to say it. "Maybe you can have good feelings instead of bad feelings if
>you would get off your butt and attempt to improve your situation for
>once." There, I just saved you 90 minutes of some CORNY, CORNY
>preaching.
>
>I'm sure this movie makes some people feel smart.
>
>YIKES.
truly bizarre image from a web site promoting this film:
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Doing my part to piss off the Christian Right
Correspondent:: "C. Woolard" Date: 19 Feb 2005 16:01:11 -0800
--------
Zapanaz wrote:
>
> truly bizarre image from a web site promoting this [Ramtha-cult
propaganda] film:
>
> http://www.whatthebleep.com/images/rotate/orig_00032.jpg
>
>
Tried to pull the old Chaos Israel stunt of backspacing to
"http://www.whatthebleep.com/images/" and got:
"error 403: Forbidden!
"The server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
Authorization will not help and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated."
Jesus, I thought *I* was an animist.
--
C.
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:30:30 -0800
--------
On 19 Feb 2005 16:01:11 -0800, "C. Woolard"
wrote:
>
>Zapanaz wrote:
>>
>> truly bizarre image from a web site promoting this [Ramtha-cult
>propaganda] film:
>>
>> http://www.whatthebleep.com/images/rotate/orig_00032.jpg
>>
>>
>
>Tried to pull the old Chaos Israel stunt of backspacing to
>"http://www.whatthebleep.com/images/" and got:
>
>"error 403: Forbidden!
>
>"The server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
>Authorization will not help and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated."
>
>Jesus, I thought *I* was an animist.
"Ford, there's a big button here that says 'do not push this button'"
"Don't push it"
"Oh!"
"What?"
"I pushed it"
"What happened?"
"A sign lit up saying 'Please do not press that button again'"
or however that goes
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE NERVE GAS, PUPPET BOY! IT'S
THE EDGE, AND THERE IS ONLY BEYOND!
--------
Wow, it's even worse than Washington Interns Gone Bad?
I'm still mad at the person who mailed a
copy of that stinker to Legume...
--With love, the Rabbs
Correspondent:: nenslo Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:49:33 -0800
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote:
>
> I'm sure this movie makes some people feel smart.
>
I had two people rave at me about how great this movie is. Because 1.
they saw it in the actual theater that is in the movie 2. they are
dumbasses.
Yes I really do know dumbasses who aren't on the internet.
Correspondent:: "Borg 74043A8933" Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:18:56 -0500
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote in message
news:160220051021172067%stang@subgeniusNOSPUM.com...
> Luckily, I was handed a good copy of it by my pal Dennis Murphy, leader
> of the rival Cult of the Living Bull.
"Another bull cult was the Buchis cult, which lasted
until about 362 AD. The Buchis bull was the
representation of the gods Re and Osiris, but it
was also linked with the god of war, Montu.
A bull had to have the specific colorings of a
black face with a white body in order to be considered Buchis."
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:36:43 -0800
--------
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:18:56 -0500, "Borg 74043A8933"
wrote:
>
>"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote in message
>news:160220051021172067%stang@subgeniusNOSPUM.com...
>
>> Luckily, I was handed a good copy of it by my pal Dennis Murphy, leader
>> of the rival Cult of the Living Bull.
>
>"Another bull cult was the Buchis cult, which lasted
>until about 362 AD. The Buchis bull was the
>representation of the gods Re and Osiris, but it
>was also linked with the god of war, Montu.
>A bull had to have the specific colorings of a
>black face with a white body in order to be considered Buchis."
>
>http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/bull.htm
well I sure didn't #$*! know that.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Gnothi Seauton
Correspondent:: "Talysman the Ur-Beatle" Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 05:55:05 GMT
--------
my thoughts on the movie:
1) I liked the wedding sequence, although I could have done
without the voiceover
2) to paraphrase what someone once said (about freud):
the true stuff in this movie wasn't very original,
and the original stuff wasn't very true.
3) I like how you have to sit through the entire credits
to figure out that most (if not all) of the supposed
scientists in the movie work for either the maharishi's
university or some other new age group.
4) at least the phony scientists *sounded* accurate.
everything Ramtha said sounded stupid and didn't match
everyday experience at all. people actually believe
"Ramtha" is a channelled extremely wise entity? damn.
I should start me a cult.
--
Talysman the Ur-Beatle, STRAWGRASPER
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:35:55 -0800
--------
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 05:55:05 GMT, "Talysman the Ur-Beatle"
wrote:
>4) at least the phony scientists *sounded* accurate.
> everything Ramtha said sounded stupid and didn't match
> everyday experience at all. people actually believe
> "Ramtha" is a channelled extremely wise entity? damn.
> I should start me a cult.
the "friendly guy with a pipe" cult idea is already taken.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's
warm for the rest of his life"
- Solid Jackson
Correspondent:: Pope Phil Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:00:39 +0000 (UTC)
--------
Talysman the Ur-Beatle wrote:
> my thoughts on the movie:
> 4) at least the phony scientists *sounded* accurate.
important tenet: SOUNDING ACCURATE IS THE SAME AS BEING ACCURATE
Correspondent:: "Rev. Ivan Stang" Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:35:20 -0500
--------
In article , Talysman the
Ur-Beatle wrote:
> my thoughts on the movie:
>
> 1) I liked the wedding sequence, although I could have done
> without the voiceover
Maybe you can explain the "dancing with I.V.s" sequence.
> 2) to paraphrase what someone once said (about freud):
> the true stuff in this movie wasn't very original,
> and the original stuff wasn't very true.
> 3) I like how you have to sit through the entire credits
> to figure out that most (if not all) of the supposed
> scientists in the movie work for either the maharishi's
> university or some other new age group.
> 4) at least the phony scientists *sounded* accurate.
> everything Ramtha said sounded stupid and didn't match
> everyday experience at all. people actually believe
> "Ramtha" is a channelled extremely wise entity? damn.
> I should start me a cult.
Successful gurus have a way of expressing their gigantic egos in a way
that dumbasses perceive as NO ego.
--
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc.
(4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected, Rev. Ivan Stang, prop.)
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
Dobbs-Approved Authorized Commercial Outreach of The Church of the SubGenius
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com PRABOB
Correspondent:: "Assco" Date: 17 Feb 2005 12:58:21 -0800
--------
Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
> There's some important business about how nice thoughts make water
> molecules look pretty, just like snowflakes in fact, whereas bad
> thoughts make water molecules look like lumpy pee. ("And if thoughts
> can do that to water, think what they can do to YOU!")
Drinking the lumpy pee will turn you into a Reptilian.
Correspondent:: purple Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:20:00 -0500
--------
On 2/16/05 10:21 AM, in article
160220051021172067%stang@subgeniusNOSPUM.com, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
wrote:
> This movie "What the#$*! Do We Know", like the embarrassing "Waking
> Life," is yet another example of serious map-territory confusion --
> more evidence that once the more insecure dumbasses of academia start
> drawing their own maps, they forget that there even IS a territory.
>
> My snide one-line review of this movie about the nature of reality:
>
> "Get real."
Correspondent:: purple Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:27:44 -0500
--------
On 2/16/05 10:21 AM, in article
160220051021172067%stang@subgeniusNOSPUM.com, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
wrote:
> This movie "What the#$*! Do We Know", like the embarrassing "Waking
> Life,"
I had noticed that Doug and Lisa had another frustrating night **cocooning**
as is the Sub's wont.
[**Cocooning** is the act of insulating or hiding oneself from the normal
social environment, which may be perceived as distracting, unfriendly,
dangerous, or otherwise unwelcome, at least for the present. Technology has
made cocooning easier than ever before. The telephone and the Internet are
inventions that made possible a kind of socialized cocooning in which one
can live in physical isolation while maintaining contact with others through
telecommunication.
The term was popularized in the 1990s by marketing consultant Faith Popcorn
in her book The Popcorn Report: The Future of Your Company, Your World, Your
Life. Popcorn suggested that cocooning could be broken down into three
different types: the socialized cocoon, in which one retreats to the privacy
of one's home; the armored cocoon, in which one establishes a barrier to
protect oneself from external threats; and the wandering cocoon, in which
one travels with a technological barrier that serves to insulate one from
the environment.
A common example of home-based cocooning is staying in to watch videos
instead of going to the movies. Wandering cocooning is evident in those who
exercise or walk around the city while being plugged in with earphones to a
private world of sound. Wireless technologies such as cell phones and PDAs
have added a new dimension of social cocooning to wandering cocooning by
allowing people to include selected others in their mobile cocoon. Examples
of armored cocooning include network firewalls, virtual private networks
(VPNs), surveillance cameras, and spyware-blocking software application.]
The Great Bob Dobbs
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:32:27 GMT
--------
purple wrote:
>On 2/16/05 10:21 AM, in article
>160220051021172067%stang@subgeniusNOSPUM.com, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
> wrote:
>
>> This movie "What the#$*! Do We Know", like the embarrassing "Waking
>> Life,"
>
>I had noticed that Doug and Lisa had another frustrating night **cocooning**
>as is the Sub's wont.
>
>[**Cocooning** is the act of insulating or hiding oneself from the normal
>social environment, which may be perceived as distracting, unfriendly,
>dangerous, or otherwise unwelcome, at least for the present. Technology has
>made cocooning easier than ever before. The telephone and the Internet are
>inventions that made possible a kind of socialized cocooning in which one
>can live in physical isolation while maintaining contact with others through
>telecommunication.
>The term was popularized in the 1990s by marketing consultant Faith Popcorn
>in her book The Popcorn Report: The Future of Your Company, Your World, Your
>Life. Popcorn suggested that cocooning could be broken down into three
>different types: the socialized cocoon, in which one retreats to the privacy
>of one's home; the armored cocoon, in which one establishes a barrier to
>protect oneself from external threats; and the wandering cocoon, in which
>one travels with a technological barrier that serves to insulate one from
>the environment.
>A common example of home-based cocooning is staying in to watch videos
>instead of going to the movies. Wandering cocooning is evident in those who
>exercise or walk around the city while being plugged in with earphones to a
>private world of sound. Wireless technologies such as cell phones and PDAs
>have added a new dimension of social cocooning to wandering cocooning by
>allowing people to include selected others in their mobile cocoon. Examples
>of armored cocooning include network firewalls, virtual private networks
>(VPNs), surveillance cameras, and spyware-blocking software application.]
>
>
>The Great Bob Dobbs
>
Mutherfuk that shit!
Fuck a bunch of cacooning!
You come out in the street,
and I'll be happy to kick yo' punk ass!
BRING IT ON, AND BRING IT WITH YOU WHEN YOU COME!
& COME STRAPPED, 'CUZ I AM. YA PONK!
Correspondent:: purple Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:57:04 -0500
--------
On 2/18/05 1:32 PM, in article
%wqRd.236900$w62.96875@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net, "König Prüß,
GfbAEV" wrote:
>
> purple wrote:
>
>> On 2/16/05 10:21 AM, in article
>> 160220051021172067%stang@subgeniusNOSPUM.com, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This movie "What the#$*! Do We Know", like the embarrassing "Waking
>>> Life,"
>>
>> I had noticed that Doug and Lisa had another frustrating night **cocooning**
>> as is the Sub's wont.
>>
>> [**Cocooning** is the act of insulating or hiding oneself from the normal
>> social environment, which may be perceived as distracting, unfriendly,
>> dangerous, or otherwise unwelcome, at least for the present. Technology has
>> made cocooning easier than ever before. The telephone and the Internet are
>> inventions that made possible a kind of socialized cocooning in which one
>> can live in physical isolation while maintaining contact with others through
>> telecommunication.
>> The term was popularized in the 1990s by marketing consultant Faith Popcorn
>> in her book The Popcorn Report: The Future of Your Company, Your World, Your
>> Life. Popcorn suggested that cocooning could be broken down into three
>> different types: the socialized cocoon, in which one retreats to the privacy
>> of one's home; the armored cocoon, in which one establishes a barrier to
>> protect oneself from external threats; and the wandering cocoon, in which
>> one travels with a technological barrier that serves to insulate one from
>> the environment.
>> A common example of home-based cocooning is staying in to watch videos
>> instead of going to the movies. Wandering cocooning is evident in those who
>> exercise or walk around the city while being plugged in with earphones to a
>> private world of sound. Wireless technologies such as cell phones and PDAs
>> have added a new dimension of social cocooning to wandering cocooning by
>> allowing people to include selected others in their mobile cocoon. Examples
>> of armored cocooning include network firewalls, virtual private networks
>> (VPNs), surveillance cameras, and spyware-blocking software application.]
>>
>>
>> The Great Bob Dobbs
>>
>
>
> Mutherfuk that shit!
> Fuck a bunch of cacooning!
>
> You come out in the street,
> and I'll be happy to kick yo' punk ass!
>
> BRING IT ON, AND BRING IT WITH YOU WHEN YOU COME!
> & COME STRAPPED, 'CUZ I AM. YA PONK!