Correspondent:: "just john" Date: 31 Jan 2005 05:47:28 -0800
--------
I've been hearing a lot about "False Slack," but I don't have access to
the writings. (The websites are blocked from here.)
Would I be right in thinking a prime, everyday sort of example of False
Slack would be an alarm clock's "snooze" button? It purports to let
you relax/sleep longer, but it just sets you up for an ADDITIONAL alarm!
Correspondent:: "nu-monet v7.0" Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:01:23 -0700
--------
just john wrote:
>
> I've been hearing a lot about "False Slack,"
> but I don't have access to the writings.
> (The websites are blocked from here.)
>
> Would I be right in thinking a prime, everyday
> sort of example of False Slack would be an alarm
> clock's "snooze" button? It purports to let you
> relax/sleep longer, but it just sets you up for
> an ADDITIONAL alarm!
The best description for Slack that exists is
"A SubGenius MUST have Slack!"
Beyond that, Slack is a singularity, undefinable
as there is nothing to compare it to. It cannot
even be contrasted to the absence of Slack, the
theoretical "anti-Slack". Even abstracts such as
mathematics cannot be applied to Slack, for example,
"infinity Slack", "the cube root of Slack", or "the
quadratic equation of Slack".
False Slack, on first inspection, would then seem
to be something that *seemed* to be a singularity,
but could, in some way, be defined. But this would
not, by itself, be a proper description, as False
Slack may transcend (or may not) "seeming" and
definition, and yet not be Slack, but be False Slack.
"False Slack is better than no Slack at all."
A good comparison would be space-time. To exist in
a relative space-time that is corrupt, destructive,
distorted, flawed, is still better than to exist in
the lack of space-time. But one could also say that
"relatively speaking", being horrifically tortured
is better than being dead, because at least you are
still alive.
Personal favorites for study of mine are "Quasi-"
and "Para-" Slack. But these have less to do with
Slack itself than with efforts to obtain more Slack,
with predictably horrible results.
Quasi-Slack is the effort to steal or otherwise
obtain someone else's Slack. This can be from the
mistaken notion that by decreasing someone else's
Slack, you automatically increase your own(*); or that
you can use some artificial means to drain the Slack
from their physical body or energy field and implant
it in yours. This can get icky.
Para-Slack is attempting to increase your Slack
through entirely synthetic or artificial means. It
is based on a corrupted understanding of the purpose
of consuming Industrial Foods. Originally, some
tried to subsist entirely on preservatives and
additives, such as artificial flavorings and syntho-
foods. Of course this produced some unpleasant side
effects, such as severe constipation(**), which was mis-
interpreted as a good thing, as it led to extended
periods of excremeditation. But they soon turned to
breakthrough technologies, and to this day attempt to
adapt new products to their increasingly mechanical
bodies. The are a techno-nerd-mage Church sect.
(*) your Slack may seem to increase, but it bears no
relation to their Slack seeming to be decreased.
(**) not a problem after the invention of Olestra.
--
"I can imagine a LOT when it comes
to unimaginable power."
-- nu-monet
Correspondent:: HellPope Huey Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:18:43 GMT
--------
In article <41FE4843.7F1D@succeeds.com>,
"nu-monet v7.0" wrote:
> (**) not a problem after the invention of Olestra.
Are you kidding? Olestra is what the "Bob"mobile uses for lubricant,
which in turn, generates its fuel.
--
HellPope Huey
The dividing line between filth and a good laugh
is only as wide
as your misplaced potential for outrage
I will lift mine eyes unto the pills.
Almost everyone takes them, from the humble aspirin
to the multi-coloured, king-sized, three deckers,
which put you to sleep, wake you up,
stimulate and soothe you all in one.
It is an age of pills.
- Malcolm Muggeridge (1903-1989)
For every prohibition you create you,
also create an underground.
- Jello Biafra
Correspondent:: "ArWeGod" Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:00:21 GMT
--------
"HellPope Huey" wrote in message
news:PoisonPixieStix-8D2E2C.10182131012005@news1.west.earthlink.net...
> In article <41FE4843.7F1D@succeeds.com>,
> "nu-monet v7.0" wrote:
>
> > (**) not a problem after the invention of Olestra.
>
> Are you kidding? Olestra is what the "Bob"mobile uses for lubricant,
> which in turn, generates its fuel.
Olestra cannot be invented nor destroyed.
--
ArWeLubed
Correspondent:: HellPope Huey Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:50:29 GMT
--------
In article ,
"ArWeGod" wrote:
> "HellPope Huey" wrote in message
> news:PoisonPixieStix-8D2E2C.10182131012005@news1.west.earthlink.net...
> > In article <41FE4843.7F1D@succeeds.com>,
> > "nu-monet v7.0" wrote:
> >
> > > (**) not a problem after the invention of Olestra.
> >
> > Are you kidding? Olestra is what the "Bob"mobile uses for lubricant,
> > which in turn, generates its fuel.
>
> Olestra cannot be invented nor destroyed.
True, but it CAN cause you to generate your own thrust if ingested in
sufficient quantities. Damn, howcum girl butts are always spoken of
sexually, but male butts are always spoken of in terms of emissions? On
here, anyway.
--
HellPope Huey
Well I'll be dipped in caramel
and licked clean by blind lesbians
as long as I don't giggle
or have one accidentally feel my beard or my uh oh
"For flavor, instant sex will never supersede
the stuff you have to peel and cook."
~ Quentin Crisp
"If I don't get my tantric sex
on oxycontin, I just can't go on!"
- Jon Stewart
Correspondent:: Eddie Vroom Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:15:48 GMT
--------
nu-monet v7.0 wrote:
> at least you are
> still alive.
Not MY problem, monkey-boy.
--
Art and Fashion for the New Conspiracy
http://www.cafepress.com/luciddragon
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor Eddie Vroom
Certified God by the holy authority of
the White Lotus Fortune Cookie Company
June 23, 2004
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:33:15 -0800
--------
On 31 Jan 2005 05:47:28 -0800, "just john"
wrote:
>I've been hearing a lot about "False Slack," but I don't have access to
>the writings. (The websites are blocked from here.)
>
>Would I be right in thinking a prime, everyday sort of example of False
>Slack would be an alarm clock's "snooze" button? It purports to let
>you relax/sleep longer, but it just sets you up for an ADDITIONAL alarm!
For that matter, just the fact that you have an alarm clock at all.
You have to go out and -pay yourself- for your own "get up and start
working" alarm. Think how many millions that saves the business con.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"Well, fuck you too, chuckles!"
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:50:10 -0500
--------
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 05:47:28 -0800, just john wrote:
> I've been hearing a lot about "False Slack," but I don't have access to
> the writings. (The websites are blocked from here.)
>
> Would I be right in thinking a prime, everyday sort of example of False
> Slack would be an alarm clock's "snooze" button? It purports to let
> you relax/sleep longer, but it just sets you up for an ADDITIONAL alarm!
I'm not an expert on Slack; since Slack cannot be defined, who COULD be
an expert on it? But since Slack CANNOT be defined it would stand to
reason that anything that CAN be defined is False Slack. That also
implies that everything that can be defined is False Slack. Since
everything is implicitly everything (except Slack), and anything is
one of the set of everything, then anything can be a good example of
False Slack. Note also that nothing cannot be an example of Slack
since nothing can be defined as "no thing," so it can be said with
confidence that since Slack is not nothing its existence is self-evident.
Correspondent:: nikolai kingsley Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 06:17:40 +1100
--------
>Would I be right in thinking a prime, everyday sort of example of False
>Slack would be an alarm clock's "snooze" button? It purports to let
>you relax/sleep longer, but it just sets you up for an ADDITIONAL alarm!
a) i find them handy for disturbing my sleep in such a way as to induce
a vague (of course it's gonna be vague - it's being generated by *my*
brain) out-of-body experience. if you get woken at fooken-christ-o'clock
in the morning, you have the opportunity to go back to sleep. if you
have a laptop running *nix you can arrange a cron job that plays an
alarm, and stagger them in forty-five minute intervals. just as you're
getting comfortably back to sleep, zap. actually, this is starting to
sound like some form of torture.
b) if you have an alarm clock that can be set to go off at odd
intervals, you can keep this up all day and still be trying to get some
sleep dammit at eleven thirty PM, just about the time you're thinking of
getting some sleep.
Correspondent:: Eddie Vroom Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:23:00 GMT
--------
just john wrote:
> I've been hearing a lot about "False Slack," but I don't have access to
> the writings. (The websites are blocked from here.)
>
> Would I be right in thinking a prime, everyday sort of example of False
> Slack would be an alarm clock's "snooze" button? It purports to let
> you relax/sleep longer, but it just sets you up for an ADDITIONAL alarm!
You're not even close on that one.
All alarm clocks are the projection of a massive fifth-dimensional being
into our space-time construct. The "snooze button" is, in fact, it's
genitals, refined by billions of years of evolution to keep it riding a
handjob that sweeps across the globe. Much like doing "The Wave".
--
Art and Fashion for the New Conspiracy
http://www.cafepress.com/luciddragon
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor Eddie Vroom
Certified God by the holy authority of
the White Lotus Fortune Cookie Company
June 23, 2004
Correspondent:: polar bear Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:38:42 -0800
--------
In article <1107179248.965249.16660@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
"just john" wrote:
> I've been hearing a lot about "False Slack," but I don't have access to
> the writings. (The websites are blocked from here.)
>
> Would I be right in thinking a prime, everyday sort of example of False
> Slack would be an alarm clock's "snooze" button? It purports to let
> you relax/sleep longer, but it just sets you up for an ADDITIONAL alarm!
There's no such thing as Slack. It's just something Stang made up to
sell memberships.
pb
Correspondent:: "ArWeGod" Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:04:56 GMT
--------
"polar bear" wrote in message
news:010220050338426481%bear@pole.com...
> In article <1107179248.965249.16660@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> "just john" wrote:
>
> > I've been hearing a lot about "False Slack," but I don't have access
to
> > the writings. (The websites are blocked from here.)
> >
> > Would I be right in thinking a prime, everyday sort of example of
False
> > Slack would be an alarm clock's "snooze" button? It purports to let
> > you relax/sleep longer, but it just sets you up for an ADDITIONAL
alarm!
>
> There's no such thing as Slack. It's just something Stang made up to
> sell memberships.
So what is this, some kind of unfunny sick joke?!!