Correspondent:: reflex Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:42:40 -0500
--------
the unstable, uneasy association that alt.tasteless has with
alt.slack? I've always found it interesting that the two groups,
via crossposts, have kinda sorta but not really got along as one
community. most of this is due of course to the crossposting of
HellPopeHuey, but not entirely; and even if it is, the rest of
the group(s) sort of condones it (but not really). it's sort of
like alt.slack and alt.tasteless are brothers, both children of
raving alcoholic dysfunctional raging manic depressive parents.
alt.slack is the skinny weird stuttering hyperactive kid who's
always trying to talk to the girls and never understanding why
they run away. alt.tasteless is his reticent, glaring,
suppressed-rage brother who never says anything unless he's
screaming it and who often disappears behind the barn to dunk
cats in gasoline and set them on fire, not even grinning as they
run "cat"erwauling away.
I mean, I'm interested from a sociolinguistic point of view.
--
Goodbye, Blackie Lamb, sorry you had to grow up--we'll miss you.
Correspondent:: "Modemac" Date: 20 Jan 2005 04:37:46 -0800
--------
reflex wrote:
> alt.slack is the skinny weird stuttering hyperactive kid who's
> always trying to talk to the girls and never understanding why
> they run away.
Fortunately, we figured out that there are weird stuttering hyperactive
girls willing to talk to us, and thus are relationships born. Or at
least some halfway decent sex.
Correspondent:: "Rev. Ivan Stang" Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:04:54 -0500
--------
In article <1106224666.754689.252530@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
Modemac wrote:
> reflex wrote:
> > alt.slack is the skinny weird stuttering hyperactive kid who's
> > always trying to talk to the girls and never understanding why
> > they run away.
>
> Fortunately, we figured out that there are weird stuttering hyperactive
> girls willing to talk to us, and thus are relationships born. Or at
> least some halfway decent sex.
>
I'd jack off in the face of a stuttering weird hyperactive woman any
day. I'd do it with RESPECT, though, that's the important thing.
If you could manage to hit your crescendo right while she was
mid-stutter in reciting, say, the Declaration of Independence, you
might get a blowback effect like spraying water into a fan, whereby you
get splattered by your own spunk because her lips are moving so fast.
Damn, I am not going to be able to watch a Porky Pig cartoon from now
on without thinking about that.
--
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc.
(4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected, Rev. Ivan Stang, prop.)
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
Dobbs-Approved Authorized Commercial Outreach of The Church of the SubGenius
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com PRABOB
Correspondent:: nenslo Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:08:25 -0800
--------
"Rev. Ivan Stang" wrote:
>
> In article <1106224666.754689.252530@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> Modemac wrote:
>
> > reflex wrote:
> > > alt.slack is the skinny weird stuttering hyperactive kid who's
> > > always trying to talk to the girls and never understanding why
> > > they run away.
> >
> > Fortunately, we figured out that there are weird stuttering hyperactive
> > girls willing to talk to us, and thus are relationships born. Or at
> > least some halfway decent sex.
> >
>
> I'd jack off in the face of a stuttering weird hyperactive woman any
> day. I'd do it with RESPECT, though, that's the important thing.
>
> If you could manage to hit your crescendo right while she was
> mid-stutter in reciting, say, the Declaration of Independence, you
> might get a blowback effect like spraying water into a fan, whereby you
> get splattered by your own spunk because her lips are moving so fast.
>
> Damn, I am not going to be able to watch a Porky Pig cartoon from now
> on without thinking about that.
Curse you, Ivan Stang. You have opened a door which cannot be closed.
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:30:58 +0000
--------
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:42:40 -0500, reflex
wrote:
>
>the unstable, uneasy association that alt.tasteless has with
>alt.slack? I've always found it interesting that the two groups,
>via crossposts, have kinda sorta but not really got along as one
>community. most of this is due of course to the crossposting of
>HellPopeHuey, but not entirely; and even if it is, the rest of
>the group(s) sort of condones it (but not really). it's sort of
>like alt.slack and alt.tasteless are brothers, both children of
>raving alcoholic dysfunctional raging manic depressive parents.
>alt.slack is the skinny weird stuttering hyperactive kid who's
>always trying to talk to the girls and never understanding why
>they run away. alt.tasteless is his reticent, glaring,
>suppressed-rage brother who never says anything unless he's
>screaming it and who often disappears behind the barn to dunk
>cats in gasoline and set them on fire, not even grinning as they
>run "cat"erwauling away.
>
>I mean, I'm interested from a sociolinguistic point of view.
Not that I know what THAT means. Probably I'm the one that has
expressed most annoyance with slack over the years. I don't deny that
there is some community of interest between the groups and at one time
the cross-posting was fruitful and, I think, generally appreciated.
However, a few years ago, they started being unselective about what
they crossposted in contrast to former practice. For a while there,
they were just about as bad as the a.t.j spammers.
HellPopeHuey is, IMNSFHO, the one responsible for the decline in what
was once a good - even unique - relationship. He's a sort of Stevet
with a bulging ego. If I was given a dispensation to rid usenet of
one, single pest among the thousands of extremely tedious lookalikes,
I think I might settle for him and gut the fucker like a haddock.
That said, he rarely irritates me now as I update his own personal
killfile filter regularly to allow for his morphing and make judicious
use of the "ignore thread" facility. Judging by how little response
the lamebrains get, everyone else is doing the same. I'd just like to
eviscerate him for the fun of the thing.
It wouldn't do to get this out of proportion. though. Their good
input was never more than marginal and their present irritation
quotient is about the same.
--
Sem
Correspondent:: HellPope Huey Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:06:56 GMT
--------
In article <7kbvu0hi2smafbqgpjeuoup6d3i12h6i6b@4ax.com>,
Semolina Pilchard wrote:
> HellPopeHuey is, IMNSFHO, the one responsible for the decline in what
> was once a good - even unique - relationship. He's a sort of Stevet
> with a bulging ego. If I was given a dispensation to rid usenet of
> one, single pest among the thousands of extremely tedious lookalikes,
> I think I might settle for him and gut the fucker like a haddock.
> That said, he rarely irritates me now as I update his own personal
> killfile filter regularly to allow for his morphing and make judicious
> use of the "ignore thread" facility. Judging by how little response
> the lamebrains get, everyone else is doing the same. I'd just like to
> eviscerate him for the fun of the thing.
How DARE you call me "responsible!?" HAH!
Things decline or do not decline based on their overall content and
tone. No one person, not even Father Stang, can decide a "final"
disposition of such a large and often staggering endeavor, heh. Besides,
"ego" is technically the developmental stage at which a baby suddenly
recognizes someone besides itself. Everyone here, even the fuckheads and
deeply lost individuals, has something resembling a SUPERego, as they
made that next leap into Community in some fashion, evidenced by the
fact that they are posting for a larger audience than themselves and
their mammy.
I have never "morphed" in some silly bid to do a dog-leg around any
detractors and retain the same handle I started with.
I get attacked much less than I get reinforced. I'm usually attacked by
people known mostly (or even ONLY) FOR attacking. Most of the posters
swing between serious and um, less so, shall we say. I enjoy their
variety.
If anyone is "irritating," its the monochromatic like bill palmer or
purple and they're more sad than objectionable per se. You can take any
perceived lack of response as you will. It IS Usenet and has no real
fixed skeleton, just a series of air bladders.
Slack and tastelessness are creche-brothers. If you remove either, the
other will falter and perhaps even wither. "Wonder Twins, activate power
of a 500-foot tall Insane Clown!"
Finally and least important, insert traditional, pointless jab
concerning your possible latent homosexuality here.
Just thought I'd say so, even if killfiled by Mr. Wonderful, who is not
in MY killfile because I sometimes find his observations or bizarre
sense of humor engaging. Tedium is in the craw of the beholder, dude.
--
HellPope Huey
How I got in my pajamas, I'll never know
"One of the saddest lessons of history is this:
If we've been bamboozled long enough,
we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.
We're no longer interested in finding out the truth.
The bamboozle has captured us.
It's simply too painful to acknowledge,
even to ourselves, that we've been taken.
Once you give a charlatan power over you,
you almost never get it back.
So the old bamboozles tend to persist
as the new ones rise."
- Carl Sagan, "The Demon Haunted World"
"I think my spleen and appendix just switched places."
- Teen Titans"
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:59:58 +0000
--------
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:06:56 GMT, HellPope Huey
wrote:
> How DARE you call me "responsible!?" HAH!
Quite. This post having been pointed out to me, it would seem
churlish not to respond in kind. I have therefore hoiked you out of
my killfile, though I still hope to disembowel you one day.
> Slack and tastelessness are creche-brothers. If you remove either, the
>other will falter and perhaps even wither. "Wonder Twins, activate power
>of a 500-foot tall Insane Clown!"
Would that it were so. Currently, at least, the evidence points the
other way.
>
> Finally and least important, insert traditional, pointless jab
>concerning your possible latent homosexuality here.
Who said anything about latency? How dare you traduce my character in
this way? Joking aside, I am rigidly and exclusively heterosexual,
though I am prepared, on occasion, to give a friend a good rogering up
the arse in a spirit of comradeship.
I draw the line at castrati, however. As Sir Richard Burton said in
his report on the male brothels of India, "the scrotum of the
unmutilated boy could be used as a kind of bridle for directing the
movements."
>
> Just thought I'd say so, even if killfiled by Mr. Wonderful, who is not
>in MY killfile because I sometimes find his observations or bizarre
>sense of humor engaging. Tedium is in the craw of the beholder, dude.
True. If you were to restrict your crossposts to alt.tasteless to
matters on topic, I could have no cause for complaint. If I, or any
subscribers to a.t, wished to revel in matters slack we would
subscribe to slack.
I'll be doing that the moment I find it even slightly preferable to
eroding myself out of existence with a belt sander. It hasn't
happened yet.
--
Sem
--------
"Semolina Pilchard" wrote in message
news:7kbvu0hi2smafbqgpjeuoup6d3i12h6i6b@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:42:40 -0500, reflex
> wrote:
>>community. most of this is due of course to the crossposting of
>>HellPopeHuey, but not entirely; and even if it is, the rest of
>>the group(s) sort of condones it (but not really). it's sort of
>>like alt.slack and alt.tasteless are brothers, both children of
Dear Sir,
Your soul is obviously lost. I implore, for your own sake, to see what is
obviously the way the truth and the light. The One Religion. The Church of
the SubGenius, of whom HellPopeHuey is deeply and religiously associated. I
for one can tell you that since the church unfurled before me in all it's
glorious wisdom and compassion, I have seen nothing but the light of a
thousand suns blazing directly onto my third nostril, and heating that
portion of my face to a frothing, plasmatic jelly of neverending power. The
ground has ceased it's attempts to eat me, after a lifetime of having to
jump from the toothy maw that would spontaneously form below my feet. My
food no longer begs me for mercy. After having my eyes gouged out at the
behest of "Bob" I see clearer than ever before. Women now take me prisoner,
and beat me, and humiliate me without mercy, whereas before I hardly ever
got a glance. I haven't been struck by lightning for over 4 weeks. The
little man in my ass no longer pokes his head out to yell at me -- only to
utter words of admiration and love. I have an almost divine ability to
command chickens. I can cut my fingers off, and still enjoy myself. So
please, you haven't any choice but to understand me with absolute clarity
here: HellPopeHuey is like a sawed off shotgun that just got a Best Picture
Oscar, and now he's loaded with ham for the post office. He'll sell you to
me, and *I* will make the profit. He once saw a picture of a anvil, and
became uneasy. Then, he vapourized everyone, even the chocolate ones. I'm
telling you man. Stay safe. Drink your drugs. Stay in milk. Don't do school.
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:51:48 -0500
--------
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:30:58 +0000, Semolina Pilchard wrote:
> It wouldn't do to get this out of proportion. though. Their good
> input was never more than marginal and their present irritation
> quotient is about the same.
I used to be a reg on a.t long before you were born. Pretty deeply
involved in it, actually. I even ran an "invitation only" mailing list
for a.t regs that was supposed to provide a back channel for us to
handle spammers and the like. Old timers on a.t, if there are any left,
might remember the "feces" mailing list.
I left a.t for several reasons. One was that it became a chore to post
there as there were so many calls to post ONLY tasteless stuff, and
anyone who simply refrained from posting was urged to post MORE.
The group was just no fun anymore.
It wasn't until Trashcan Man committed suicide after John Denver's
plane crash that I finally decided to leave, though. That was the straw
that broke the camel's back.
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:12:53 +0000
--------
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:51:48 -0500, Artemia Salina
wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:30:58 +0000, Semolina Pilchard wrote:
>
>> It wouldn't do to get this out of proportion. though. Their good
>> input was never more than marginal and their present irritation
>> quotient is about the same.
>
>I used to be a reg on a.t long before you were born.
And the year of my birth was, motormouth?
[...] snip list of "I did" shit.
--
Sem
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:11:27 -0500
--------
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:12:53 +0000, Semolina Pilchard wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:51:48 -0500, Artemia Salina
> wrote:
>>I used to be a reg on a.t long before you were born.
>
> And the year of my birth was, motormouth?
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:11:37 GMT
--------
reflex wrote:
>
>the unstable, uneasy association that alt.tasteless has with
>alt.slack? I've always found it interesting that the two groups,
>via crossposts, have kinda sorta but not really got along as one
>community. most of this is due of course to the crossposting of
>HellPopeHuey, but not entirely; and even if it is, the rest of
>the group(s) sort of condones it (but not really). it's sort of
>like alt.slack and alt.tasteless are brothers, both children of
>raving alcoholic dysfunctional raging manic depressive parents.
>alt.slack is the skinny weird stuttering hyperactive kid who's
>always trying to talk to the girls and never understanding why
>they run away. alt.tasteless is his reticent, glaring,
>suppressed-rage brother who never says anything unless he's
>screaming it and who often disappears behind the barn to dunk
>cats in gasoline and set them on fire, not even grinning as they
>run "cat"erwauling away.
>
>I mean, I'm interested from a sociolinguistic point of view.
>
>--
Why? Are you trying to get invited to Prince Harry's Surprise Party?
Correspondent:: "Rev. Ivan Stang" Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:34:23 -0500
--------
In article , reflex
wrote:
> the unstable, uneasy association that alt.tasteless has with
> alt.slack? I've always found it interesting that the two groups,
> via crossposts, have kinda sorta but not really got along as one
> community. most of this is due of course to the crossposting of
> HellPopeHuey, but not entirely; and even if it is, the rest of
> the group(s) sort of condones it (but not really). it's sort of
> like alt.slack and alt.tasteless are brothers, both children of
> raving alcoholic dysfunctional raging manic depressive parents.
> alt.slack is the skinny weird stuttering hyperactive kid who's
> always trying to talk to the girls and never understanding why
> they run away. alt.tasteless is his reticent, glaring,
> suppressed-rage brother who never says anything unless he's
> screaming it and who often disappears behind the barn to dunk
> cats in gasoline and set them on fire, not even grinning as they
> run "cat"erwauling away.
>
> I mean, I'm interested from a sociolinguistic point of view.
What I can't understand is why someone would feel that readers of a
newsgroup that is obviously humor-oriented, such as alt.tasteless,
would have anything whatsoever in common with readers of an extremely
serious and somewhat prim religious newsgroup, like alt.slack.
I see crossposting in general as a sign of assholiness, vanity and bad
toilet training, and while I have enjoyed many of the crossposted
insults from the worthies of alt.tasteless, I can easily see why some
wouldn't welcome having alt.slack posts forced down their craws. (God
damn it, now you got ME doing it!) Most of the SubGenii don't even get
along with each other, much less with members of rival cults, isms,
cliques, Internet geek-squads and world religions.
If the attention-deprived absolutely MUST crosspost, though, better
alt.tasteless than some of the other ones we get.
--
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc.
(4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected, Rev. Ivan Stang, prop.)
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
Dobbs-Approved Authorized Commercial Outreach of The Church of the SubGenius
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com PRABOB
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:08:42 +0000
--------
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:34:23 -0500, "Rev. Ivan Stang"
wrote:
>What I can't understand is why someone would feel that readers of a
>newsgroup that is obviously humor-oriented, such as alt.tasteless,
>would have anything whatsoever in common with readers of an extremely
>serious and somewhat prim religious newsgroup, like alt.slack.
Indeed. I'm amazed that you haven't zapped us to hell and gone for
our heresy ere now.
>
>I see crossposting in general as a sign of assholiness, vanity and bad
>toilet training, and while I have enjoyed many of the crossposted
>insults from the worthies of alt.tasteless, I can easily see why some
>wouldn't welcome having alt.slack posts forced down their craws. (God
>damn it, now you got ME doing it!) Most of the SubGenii don't even get
>along with each other, much less with members of rival cults, isms,
>cliques, Internet geek-squads and world religions.
Quite so. Likewise, our worship of the Great God Glub specifically
forbids fuckin' around with other cults. I detest religious sluts,
myself. Promiscuity is for sex, not belief systems.
>
>If the attention-deprived absolutely MUST crosspost, though, better
>alt.tasteless than some of the other ones we get.
How reasonable. I still favour a fatwah on cross-posters, though.
You can take reason too far.
--
Sem
Correspondent:: fungus Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:38:56 +0100
--------
Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
> In article , reflex
> wrote:
>
>
>>the unstable, uneasy association that alt.tasteless has with
>>alt.slack?
>>
>>I mean, I'm interested from a sociolinguistic point of view.
>
>
> What I can't understand is why someone would feel that readers of a
> newsgroup that is obviously humor-oriented, such as alt.tasteless,
> would have anything whatsoever in common with readers of an extremely
> serious and somewhat prim religious newsgroup, like alt.slack.
>
Um, we don't. The only reason you see any crossposts
is because of a few immature idiots who hang out
over there.
--
fungus
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:02:16 -0800
--------
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:38:56 +0100, fungus
wrote:
>Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
>> In article , reflex
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>the unstable, uneasy association that alt.tasteless has with
>>>alt.slack?
>>>
>>>I mean, I'm interested from a sociolinguistic point of view.
>>
>>
>> What I can't understand is why someone would feel that readers of a
>> newsgroup that is obviously humor-oriented, such as alt.tasteless,
>> would have anything whatsoever in common with readers of an extremely
>> serious and somewhat prim religious newsgroup, like alt.slack.
>>
>
>Um, we don't. The only reason you see any crossposts
>is because of a few immature idiots who hang out
>over there.
yeah it's a shame that you would have to put up with people who can't
live up to the high standards of conduct inherent in a newsgroup
devoted to being tasteless.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Warning - this message is not FDA approved for use as a flotation
device.
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:38:31 +0000
--------
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:02:16 -0800, Zapanaz
wrote:
>yeah it's a shame that you would have to put up with people who can't
>live up to the high standards of conduct inherent in a newsgroup
>devoted to being tasteless.
You conflate the concepts of conduct and content, Mr. Zapanaz. This
is not an uncommon error among those of inferior intellect, so don't
feel too bad about it.
What we talk about in alt.tasteless is sometimes upsetting for sheeple
like yourself, but our conduct is absofuckinglutely impeccable.
Comprenez?
--
Sem
Correspondent:: "Assco" Date: 20 Jan 2005 15:07:16 -0800
--------
<
conduct and content, Mr. Zapanaz.
This is not an uncommon error...
but our conduct is absofuckinglutely
impeccable. Comprenez?>>
You conspire and collude to take a crap
in the tea kettles of a coffee klatch
catering to coprophagian conspirators
of like kind, capiche?
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:14:49 -0500
--------
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:38:31 +0000, Semolina Pilchard wrote:
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:00:55 +0000
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:14:49 -0500, Artemia Salina
wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:38:31 +0000, Semolina Pilchard wrote:
>
>> those of inferior intellect,
>
>> absofuckinglutely
>
>WAHAHAHA!
You're easily amused, SeaMonkey. I think you made the right move in
getting out of alt.tasteless all those eons ago, when you were one of
its leading lights (heh). slack is definitely a more appropriate
venue for your coruscating wit and razor-sharp intellect.
--
Sem
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:56:00 -0500
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:00:55 +0000, Semolina Pilchard wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:14:49 -0500, Artemia Salina
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:38:31 +0000, Semolina Pilchard wrote:
>>
>>> those of inferior intellect,
>>
>>> absofuckinglutely
>>
>>WAHAHAHA!
>
> You're easily amused, SeaMonkey.
It's the irony of your statements. I think you missed it.
Speaking of handles, allow me to complement you on yours. "Semolina
Pilchard." My, what an intriguingly clever and original name! How
long did it take you to think that up, and what does it mean?
> I think you made the right move in
> getting out of alt.tasteless all those eons ago, when you were one of
> its leading lights (heh). slack is definitely a more appropriate
> venue for your coruscating wit and razor-sharp intellect.
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:42:54 +0000
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:56:00 -0500, Artemia Salina
wrote:
>> You're easily amused, SeaMonkey.
>
>It's the irony of your statements. I think you missed it.
Nah. I ignored it. It was at your usual standard. Piss poor, that
is.
>
>Speaking of handles, allow me to complement you on yours. "Semolina
>Pilchard." My, what an intriguingly clever and original name! How
>long did it take you to think that up, and what does it mean?
complement: (n) A word or phrase used to complete a grammatical
construction; A complete number or quantity; Number needed to make up
whole force; Something added to complete or make perfect; One of a
series of enzymes in the blood serum that are part of the immune
response; Either of two parts that mutually complete each other.
(v) Make complete or perfect; supply what is wanting or form the
complement to.
Good one, saline shrimp, you illiterate cretin.
You're not exactly used to this sort of thing, are you - thinking,
writing and such?
--
Sem
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:01:18 -0500
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:42:54 +0000, Semolina Pilchard wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:56:00 -0500, Artemia Salina
> wrote:
>>Speaking of handles, allow me to complement you on yours. "Semolina
>>Pilchard." My, what an intriguingly clever and original name! How
>>long did it take you to think that up, and what does it mean?
>
> complement: (n) A word or phrase used to complete a grammatical
> construction; A complete number or quantity; Number needed to make up
> whole force; Something added to complete or make perfect; One of a
> series of enzymes in the blood serum that are part of the immune
> response; Either of two parts that mutually complete each other.
> (v) Make complete or perfect; supply what is wanting or form the
> complement to.
>
> Good one, saline shrimp, you illiterate cretin.
>
> You're not exactly used to this sort of thing, are you - thinking,
> writing and such?
Do you consider yourself a representative of a.t? Do others?
This is what a.t has become; unfunny, unoriginal, not shocking
or disgusting. The clever posters left long ago. There's nothing
left but nattering mouth-breathers whose idea of a witty retort
is a grammar flame (I await your "Well, it's good enough for you"
response). As to my reasons for leaving a.t, I rest my case.
P.S. Your apparent pride in figuring out what "Artemia Salina"
refers to is pathetic. Anyone who can type it into Google can
figure it out. Sheesh!
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:43:43 +0000
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:01:18 -0500, Artemia Salina
wrote:
>Do you consider yourself a representative of a.t? Do others?
>This is what a.t has become; unfunny, unoriginal, not shocking
>or disgusting. The clever posters left long ago. There's nothing
>left but nattering mouth-breathers whose idea of a witty retort
>is a grammar flame (I await your "Well, it's good enough for you"
>response). As to my reasons for leaving a.t, I rest my case.
You left a.t long, long before I came. Either that or you were
intensely insignificant, probably the latter. I expect someone
stamped on you and you left in tears to get a cuddle in slack.
It wasn't one of these a.t mouth-breathers to whom you refer who made
a cunt of himself by substituting one well-known word for another,
sea-louse. That isn't a failure of grammar, by the way. Just simple,
straightforward ignorance.
a.t tends to sink to this level when it has to deal with slack-witted
crossposters. You're no challenge. That's why we'd rather you just
fucked off. The rest of the time it's OK, though admittedly not what
it once was; mind you I cannot comment upon how it was when you ran
it, as you tell us (heh). I did have a look at slack once - kicked a
few arses while I was there - and I was impressed by just how foolish,
childish and pretentious a newsgroup can get when it's inhabited by
the likes of you.
>P.S. Your apparent pride in figuring out what "Artemia Salina"
>refers to is pathetic. Anyone who can type it into Google can
>figure it out. Sheesh!
Damned if I do and damned if I don't, salty arthropod? I don't take
any pride in finding out what your foolish moniker means. I'm amazed
you stick with it. It's par for the course, really, though; you've
already demonstrated that you're a sad cunt with little knowledge and
no judgement.
--
Sem
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:32:33 -0800
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:01:18 -0500, Artemia Salina
wrote:
>Do you consider yourself a representative of a.t? Do others?
>This is what a.t has become; unfunny, unoriginal, not shocking
>or disgusting. The clever posters left long ago. There's nothing
>left but nattering mouth-breathers whose idea of a witty retort
>is a grammar flame (I await your "Well, it's good enough for you"
>response). As to my reasons for leaving a.t, I rest my case.
Personally I have yet to see anything that doesn't amount to "I know
you are, but what am I?" from the godlike wits on a.t
It reminds me of a grade school playground argument.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
They should replace all walnuts with pecans.
- Rev. Mary Magdalen
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:38:42 GMT
--------
Zapanaz wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:01:18 -0500, Artemia Salina
> wrote:
>
>>Do you consider yourself a representative of a.t? Do others?
>>This is what a.t has become; unfunny, unoriginal, not shocking
>>or disgusting. The clever posters left long ago. There's nothing
>>left but nattering mouth-breathers whose idea of a witty retort
>>is a grammar flame (I await your "Well, it's good enough for you"
>>response). As to my reasons for leaving a.t, I rest my case.
>
>Personally I have yet to see anything that doesn't amount to "I know
>you are, but what am I?" from the godlike wits on a.t
>
>It reminds me of a grade school playground argument.
>
Lost your lunch money a lot, did you?
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:00:18 +0000
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:32:33 -0800, Zapanaz
wrote:
>
>Personally I have yet to see anything that doesn't amount to "I know
>you are, but what am I?" from the godlike wits on a.t
That's because of your own inability to follow an argument or even
understand it.
What I see is yourself and Artemia Whatthefuck'shisface being unable
to deal with the cogent points put to you and instead making asides
and diversions to try to retain whatever dignity you believe you still
have. Your belief is erroneous.
To get back to reflex's original question, you Joe, more than anyone,
came sailing into alt.t on HellPopeHuey's coattails with your
inappropriate, off-topic and pretentious chatter. I believe that
happened first because you were too stupid to see that it was
cross-posted. Later, it became the spoiled child's argument of "I
can, so I will," and you continued to pollute the group with your shit
despite protests from all and sundry. And you were humiliated, of
course.
Whatever community of interest there might have been between the two
groups is clearly a thing of the past. Stick with your slack little
circle jerk and stop your foolish cross-posting.
>
>It reminds me of a grade school playground argument.
It's not that good. The eight year olds would eat you for breakfast.
--
Sem
--------
In article ,
Artemia Salina wrote:
>Do you consider yourself a representative of a.t? Do others?
>This is what a.t has become; unfunny, unoriginal, not shocking
>or disgusting. The clever posters left long ago. There's nothing
>left but nattering mouth-breathers whose idea of a witty retort
>is a grammar flame (I await your "Well, it's good enough for you"
>response). As to my reasons for leaving a.t, I rest my case.
By my book you're just some wet behind the ears pissant who
left AT in one of its supposed dark days because other people
weren't lubricating your dick enough with funny stories. I've
been haunting these halls since the number of posts was just 3
digits, and can't for the fucking life of me recall you or
anything you've ever contributed of merit.
Admittedly Semolina Pilchard is ambling around on a low note,
tossing semi-notable flames that do little more than prove he
still has a pulse. That he's done better in the past doesn't
give him a pass, but its a damn sight better than some self
proclaimed AT geezer falling out of his Usenet coffin long
enough to wheeze up a dusty rant about how much things suck.
News flash for you - the "good old days" had their many periods
of funk, too. And there are those from the latter half of ATs
history that have contributed gems every bit as good as those
of the first half, in similar quantity.
If you're that much of an old timer, you'd know there's *two*
AT mottos that apply here - "encourage quality, discourage crap"
is the only one you seem to know. The other one is "if you want
quality, provide it yourself". In other words, put up or shut up -
I haven't seen you post a damn thing worth reading recently, when
you do you'll have some credentials to bitch.
-Robert "My butt cheeks should be printed on napkins so the whole nation
can kiss my ass" Stetler-
-kgb@rawbw.com-
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:35:15 -0500
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:49:03 +0000, Cubicle Morlock wrote:
> In article ,
> Artemia Salina wrote:
>>Do you consider yourself a representative of a.t? Do others?
>>This is what a.t has become; unfunny, unoriginal, not shocking
>>or disgusting. The clever posters left long ago. There's nothing
>>left but nattering mouth-breathers whose idea of a witty retort
>>is a grammar flame (I await your "Well, it's good enough for you"
>>response). As to my reasons for leaving a.t, I rest my case.
>
> By my book
Why is your book important?
> you're just some wet behind the ears pissant who
> left AT in one of its supposed dark days because other people
> weren't lubricating your dick enough with funny stories.
As I said, no one was lubing anyone's dick. Everyone was focused
on TELLING everyone else to lube dicks more. What used to be
hilarious became a tedious chore.
> I've
> been haunting these halls since the number of posts was just 3
> digits,
You'll have to be more clear here.
> and can't for the fucking life of me recall you or
> anything you've ever contributed of merit.
I expect not. So what?
> Admittedly Semolina Pilchard is ambling around on a low note,
> tossing semi-notable flames that do little more than prove he
> still has a pulse.
You call a flame that "does little more than prove [someone] still
has a pulse" to be semi-notable? You must keep LOTS of notes. I
guess that's why you have a book.
His so-called flames are nothing more than straw men (claiming
that I'm ignorant because I confused the spelling of "compliment"
and "complement", for example) used to avoid my criticism of him.
I was right, and you know it; he is unoriginal, unimaginative, and
probably lacks a sense of humor.
> That he's done better in the past doesn't
> give him a pass, but its a damn sight better than some self
> proclaimed AT geezer falling out of his Usenet coffin long
> enough to wheeze up a dusty rant about how much things suck.
Things suck. Deal with it. Specifically, things in a.t suck.
> News flash for you - the "good old days" had their many periods
> of funk, too. And there are those from the latter half of ATs
> history that have contributed gems every bit as good as those
> of the first half, in similar quantity.
Name one current a.t-er who writes as funnily as Steven Snedker
in character as a transsexual with a colostomy bag recounting his
nightmare about being raped by Fabio.
Name one a.t-er who can flame and quip like Geoff Miller.
I admire your loyalty, but it does a disservice to your honesty.
> If you're that much of an old timer, you'd know there's *two*
> AT mottos that apply here - "encourage quality, discourage crap"
> is the only one you seem to know. The other one is "if you want
> quality, provide it yourself". In other words, put up or shut up -
I agree with both. However the unspoken motto became "If you're a
GOOD a.t-er you'll provide a steady enough stream of tastelessness
to drown out the noise - and no, you can't just ignore the noise;
you MUST FIGHT IT!"
That'd drive anyone with a sense of humor out, which is what
happened.
> I haven't seen you post a damn thing worth reading recently, when
> you do you'll have some credentials to bitch.
That's a typical a.t cop-out. Just because I haven't posted anything
you like doesn't automatically invalidate my critique. After all, you've
never posted anything that I like. Should that invalidate your critique
of me?
> -Robert "My butt cheeks should be printed on napkins so the whole nation
> can kiss my ass" Stetler-
> -kgb@rawbw.com-
Correspondent:: Pantheras Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:43:38 GMT
--------
Artemia Salina wrote:
>>I've
>>been haunting these halls since the number of posts was just 3
>>digits,
>>and can't for the fucking life of me recall you or
>>anything you've ever contributed of merit.
> I expect not. So what?
About a year ago, I posted a message of nothing but names of people
that had posted here taken from all the archives that I could find
over a month long period. What name were you posting under way back
when we just had a 3 digit count? (I think Semolina might have used
a lot more creativity than you did in choosing a name)
Cork-O-Mattic
The Proper Stopper
Exclusive butt plug of
the Special Olympics
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:37:35 -0500
--------
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:43:38 +0000, Pantheras wrote:
> About a year ago, I posted a message of nothing but names of people
> that had posted here taken from all the archives that I could find
> over a month long period. What name were you posting under way back
> when we just had a 3 digit count?
What would the point in saying be? If you're honestly curious though,
put it this way; if the Martial Law FAQ[1] still gets posted on a.t, then
my name still gets mentioned on a.t to this day. But what name I used
is beside the point; I could've just been a lurker and my observations
about a.t and Semolina Pilchard would still have the same validity.
> (I think Semolina might have used
> a lot more creativity than you did in choosing a name)
Really? How so? I never claimed that my name was especially
creative, but it took more thought than to just rip off a phrase
from a song, and it'd make more sense if you knew the back-story
behind it.
[1] I'll tell you a bit of trivia about the Martial Law FAQ. It
was originally suggested by Steven Snedker and written by him.
Snedker, "St. Ool", was a Great Patron of a.t behind the scenes.
I don't think most people realize how much credit he deserves.
Before the MLF was first posted it was embellished upon to give
it more, uh, "color." There were some technical issues that had
to be resolved as well. I remember that the policy about binaries
was a subject of some debate. We didn't want to come across as being
censorious so we developed the policy of forge canceling and reposting
into an appropriate group.
Correspondent:: "angelicusrex" Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:42:12 -0700
--------
Jesus, Art, stop being such a crank! If you think something is wrong with
the NG, either leave, or make it better! But stimulating twenty posts
telling you what an ass you are is hardly worth my time and effort to wade
through. I don't give a rat's ass how long anyone has been here, so long as
they contribute something in the true Subgenus framework. Everything else is
dross. I can find this flame-shit on every other NG.
Archimandrite Pudlevitcz
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:36:20 -0500
--------
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:42:12 -0700, angelicusrex wrote:
> But stimulating twenty posts
> telling you what an ass you are is hardly worth my time and effort to wade
> through.
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:44:33 -0800
--------
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:42:12 -0700, "angelicusrex"
wrote:
>But stimulating twenty posts
>telling you what an ass you are is hardly worth my time and effort to wade
>through
But it tells you a lot about the tenor of the group.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"Insight into popular culture is like keeping meticulous
records of the activities of your hamster." - Nenslo
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 03:00:43 -0500
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:49:03 +0000, Cubicle Morlock wrote:
> I've been haunting these halls since the number of posts was just 3
> digits,
I know that I asked you to clarify your statement in my previous post,
but it isn't necessary. Just tell me what year Trashcan Man committed
suicide over John Denver's death, as I had mentioned in my first post
to this thread. Was that before or after you began hanging out in a.t?
Correspondent:: E Varden Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:49:33 -0500
--------
Artemia Salina wrote:
>
> Speaking of handles, allow me to complement you on yours. "Semolina
> Pilchard." My, what an intriguingly clever and original name! How
> long did it take you to think that up, and what does it mean?
Allow me to help out here, "Artemia". It's from a Beatles song.
HTH, Ischemia or whatever the fuck you call yourself today.
Pe
===
"Wasn't Salinas where Frank Lloyd Wright wrote Cannery Row question
mark"
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:03:56 GMT
--------
E Varden wrote:
>Artemia Salina wrote:
>
>>
>> Speaking of handles, allow me to complement you on yours. "Semolina
>> Pilchard." My, what an intriguingly clever and original name! How
>> long did it take you to think that up, and what does it mean?
>
>Allow me to help out here, "Artemia". It's from a Beatles song.
>
>HTH, Ischemia or whatever the fuck you call yourself today.
>
>
>Pe
>===
>"Wasn't Salinas where Frank Lloyd Wright wrote Cannery Row question
>mark"
I think that Salinas was where the Choad Fambly picked frijoles in "Tortilla Flats"
Castroville is the Artichoke Capital of the World, and they have a sign "12 Artichokes $1"
but they are little bitty artichokes and if you want big artichokes, they cost more. The
honey almonds are good. Salinas has lettuce all the way to the mountains. Castroville
has a big artichoke luau every year. At night, they have blinking neon signs that say,
ARTICHOKE-ARTICHOKE-ARTICHOKE in case you forget about them.
Gilroy has garlic. They have a big garlic festival, and the garlic calamari is good,
but you got to really like garlic to try the garlic ice cream and garlic wine. They had
an Indian Motorcycle Factoiry, so you could ride around on an Indian and smell garlic.
On the other hand, no werewolves for miles around.
Correspondent:: Pantheras Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:56:18 GMT
--------
König Prüß wrote:
> I think that Salinas was where the Choad Fambly picked frijoles in "Tortilla Flats"
> Castroville is the Artichoke Capital of the World, and they have a sign "12 Artichokes $1"
> but they are little bitty artichokes and if you want big artichokes, they cost more. The
> honey almonds are good. Salinas has lettuce all the way to the mountains. Castroville
> has a big artichoke luau every year. At night, they have blinking neon signs that say,
> ARTICHOKE-ARTICHOKE-ARTICHOKE in case you forget about them.
> Gilroy has garlic. They have a big garlic festival, and the garlic calamari is good,
> but you got to really like garlic to try the garlic ice cream and garlic wine. They had
> an Indian Motorcycle Factoiry, so you could ride around on an Indian and smell garlic.
Gosh in an environment like that, you would think someone would plant
sugar beets.
Bobbi dearest, do you have a neighbor?
--
Cork-O-Mattic
The Proper Stopper
Exclusive butt plug of
the Special Olympics
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:01:54 GMT
--------
Pantheras wrote:
> König Prüß wrote:
>
> > I think that Salinas was where the Choad Fambly picked frijoles in "Tortilla Flats"
> > Castroville is the Artichoke Capital of the World, and they have a sign "12 Artichokes $1"
> > but they are little bitty artichokes and if you want big artichokes, they cost more. The
> > honey almonds are good. Salinas has lettuce all the way to the mountains. Castroville
> > has a big artichoke luau every year. At night, they have blinking neon signs that say,
> > ARTICHOKE-ARTICHOKE-ARTICHOKE in case you forget about them.
> > Gilroy has garlic. They have a big garlic festival, and the garlic calamari is good,
> > but you got to really like garlic to try the garlic ice cream and garlic wine. They had
> > an Indian Motorcycle Factoiry, so you could ride around on an Indian and smell garlic.
>
> Gosh in an environment like that, you would think someone would plant
> sugar beets.
>
> Bobbi dearest, do you have a neighbor?
>
Yeah! She's really ugly, but she'll date anybody.
Want me to fix you up?
Correspondent:: "angelicusrex" Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:47:19 -0700
--------
>>"Wasn't Salinas where Frank Lloyd Wright wrote Cannery Row question
>>mark"
That wasn't Frank Lloyd Wright! That was Sal Mineo! No, wait, Saul Bellow?
Uhm, Ken Kesey? Who was that Polack author anyway!!! Dammit!
Archimandrite Pudlevitcz
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:39:07 -0500
--------
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:47:19 -0700, angelicusrex wrote:
Correspondent:: "angelicusrex" Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:22:02 -0700
--------
"Artemia Salina" wrote in message
news:pan.2005.01.23.03.39.07.285605@sheayright.com...
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:47:19 -0700, angelicusrex wrote:
>
>> Who was that Polack author anyway!!! Dammit!
>
> Charles Bukowski.
>
> Now stop making me wade through your posts.
You first, darlin'.
0;-) 0;-) 0;-) 0;-) (-;0 (-;0 (-;0 (-;0
0;-) David St. Albans (-;0
0;-) Surrounded by Angels (-;0
0;-) who wink... (-;0
0;-) 0;-) 0;-) 0;-) (-;0 (-;0 (-;0 (-;0
Correspondent:: "angelicusrex" Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:44:51 -0700
--------
Semolina pilchard, climbing up the Eiffel tower, stupid bloody Tuesday boy
you've been a naughty girl you let your knickers down...I am the Eggman.
They are the eggmen, I am the Walrus---Kookatchoob!
Ah, now those were the days!
Archimandrite Pudlevitcz
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:56:57 -0500
--------
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:49:33 -0500, E Varden wrote:
> Artemia Salina wrote:
>
>>
>> Speaking of handles, allow me to complement you on yours. "Semolina
>> Pilchard." My, what an intriguingly clever and original name! How
>> long did it take you to think that up, and what does it mean?
>
> Allow me to help out here, "Artemia". It's from a Beatles song.
Man, you're a lightning wit, aren't you, "Eve". I'm sure a.t must be
glad to have you around to straighten out the clueless with your
keen reading skills and exceptional ability to respond to sarcastic
remarks as though they were sincere. Devastated is what I am.
Devastated!
Correspondent:: E Varden Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:43:59 -0500
--------
Artemia Salina wrote:
>
>
> Man, you're a lightning wit, aren't you, "Eve". I'm sure a.t must be
> glad to have you around to straighten out the clueless with your
> keen reading skills and exceptional ability to respond to sarcastic
> remarks as though they were sincere. Devastated is what I am.
> Devastated!
>
Why, thankew! Coming from you, that's quite a condiment!
Pe
---
(The poor sack of lint presumes the poster to be someone named
"Eve"...would YOU want this person on the deck of the Enterprise
question mark)
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:25:25 -0500
--------
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:43:59 -0500, E Varden wrote:
> (The poor sack of lint presumes the poster to be someone named
> "Eve"...would YOU want this person on the deck of the Enterprise
> question mark)
Correspondent:: E Varden Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:20:05 -0500
--------
Artemia Salina wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:43:59 -0500, E Varden wrote:
>
>
>
>>(The poor sack of lint presumes the poster to be someone named
>>"Eve"...would YOU want this person on the deck of the Enterprise
>>question mark)
>
>
> http://www.the-forum.com/ephemera/images/tvg53.jpg
>
>
So What does this pic have to do with E Varden question mark
-Armis Brooks (who also has doubts about the ability of Artesian to
function beyond shovelling fuel into the dithermic reactatron...)
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:38:04 -0500
--------
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:20:05 -0500, E Varden wrote:
> Artemia Salina wrote:
>> http://www.the-forum.com/ephemera/images/tvg53.jpg
>>
>>
> So What does this pic have to do with E Varden question mark
Correspondent:: "Steve Thompson" Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:26:54 -0000
--------
"Artemia Salina" wrote in message
news:pan.2005.01.24.02.38.03.949368@sheayright.com...
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:20:05 -0500, E Varden wrote:
>
> > Artemia Salina wrote:
>
> >> http://www.the-forum.com/ephemera/images/tvg53.jpg
> >>
> >>
> > So What does this pic have to do with E Varden question mark
>
> What pic?
The real question is how did Varden learn what PIC is?
Regards,
Steve
Correspondent:: "Steve Thompson" Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:20:00 -0000
--------
"E Varden" wrote in message
news:1106509474.277300@www.vif.com...
> Artemia Salina wrote:
> >
> >
> > Man, you're a lightning wit, aren't you, "Eve". I'm sure a.t must be
> > glad to have you around to straighten out the clueless with your
> > keen reading skills and exceptional ability to respond to sarcastic
> > remarks as though they were sincere. Devastated is what I am.
> > Devastated!
> >
>
> Why, thankew! Coming from you, that's quite a condiment!
Fuckin' joker.
> Pe
> ---
> (The poor sack of lint presumes the poster to be someone named
> "Eve"...would YOU want this person on the deck of the Enterprise
> question mark)
What makes you even slightly qualified to ask such questions mark.
Regards,
Steve
Correspondent:: "angelicusrex" Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:23:58 -0700
--------
"Artemia Salina" (Mmm some likes the "Vancome Lady!"
wrote in message
> Man, you're a lightning wit, aren't you, "Eve". I'm sure a.t must be
> glad to have you around to straighten out the clueless with your
> keen reading skills and exceptional ability to respond to sarcastic
> remarks as though they were sincere. Devastated is what I am.
> Devastated!
Wow.
You wrote a flame.
Wow.
0;-) 0;-) 0;-) 0;-) (-;0 (-;0 (-;0 (-;0
0;-) David St. Albans (-;0
0;-) Surrounded by Angels (-;0
0;-) who wink... (-;0
0;-) 0;-) 0;-) 0;-) (-;0 (-;0 (-;0 (-;0
Correspondent:: Artemia Salina Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:37:27 -0500
--------
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:23:58 -0700, angelicusrex wrote:
>
>
> "Artemia Salina" (Mmm some likes the "Vancome Lady!"
> wrote in message
>
>> Man, you're a lightning wit, aren't you, "Eve". I'm sure a.t must be
>> glad to have you around to straighten out the clueless with your
>> keen reading skills and exceptional ability to respond to sarcastic
>> remarks as though they were sincere. Devastated is what I am.
>> Devastated!
>
> Wow.
>
> You wrote a flame.
>
> Wow.
>
> 0;-) 0;-) 0;-) 0;-) (-;0 (-;0 (-;0 (-;0
> 0;-) David St. Albans (-;0
> 0;-) Surrounded by Angels (-;0
> 0;-) who wink... (-;0
> 0;-) 0;-) 0;-) 0;-) (-;0 (-;0 (-;0 (-;0
Boy, for a guy who doesn't like flames, you sure like to flame.
Correspondent:: joecosby@mindspring.com
Date: 21 Jan 2005 01:43:59 -0800
--------
Semolina Pilchard wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:02:16 -0800, Zapanaz
> wrote:
>
> >yeah it's a shame that you would have to put up with people who
can't
> >live up to the high standards of conduct inherent in a newsgroup
> >devoted to being tasteless.
>
> You conflate the concepts of conduct and content, Mr. Zapanaz. This
> is not an uncommon error among those of inferior intellect, so don't
> feel too bad about it.
>
No, I don't.
The other person referred to people who crossposted as immature. It
makes no sense to interpret that as having anything to do with
"content".
That is not an uncommon line of bullshit though among those who take
their newsgroup way too seriously and reply to any intrusion to it as
they would to being violently raped.
> What we talk about in alt.tasteless is sometimes upsetting for
sheeple
> like yourself, but our conduct is absofuckinglutely impeccable.
>
I've never seen anything from you that struck me as anything but dull,
repetitive and on an intellectual level with grade-school kids
discovering their first dirty words.
Pretending that anybody who finds you dull and stupid is, in reality,
part of a conspiracy of dunces who ostracize you because they know you
are SO SUPERIOR, is a pretty useful formula for a loser who can't deal
with their utter inability to deal with people.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"Kilgore Trout once wrote a short story which was a dialogue between
two
pieces of yeast. They were discussing the possible purposes of life as
they ate sugar and suffocated in their own excrement. But because of
their limited perspective, they never came close to guessing they were
making champagne."
-- Kurt Vonnegut
Correspondent:: König Prüß, GfbAEV Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:14:53 GMT
--------
joecosby wrote:
>
>Semolina Pilchard wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:02:16 -0800, Zapanaz
>> wrote:
>>
>> >yeah it's a shame that you would have to put up with people who
>can't
>> >live up to the high standards of conduct inherent in a newsgroup
>> >devoted to being tasteless.
>>
>> You conflate the concepts of conduct and content, Mr. Zapanaz. This
>> is not an uncommon error among those of inferior intellect, so don't
>> feel too bad about it.
>>
>
>No, I don't.
>
>The other person referred to people who crossposted as immature. It
>makes no sense to interpret that as having anything to do with
>"content".
>
>That is not an uncommon line of bullshit though among those who take
>their newsgroup way too seriously and reply to any intrusion to it as
>they would to being violently raped.
>
>
>> What we talk about in alt.tasteless is sometimes upsetting for
>sheeple
>> like yourself, but our conduct is absofuckinglutely impeccable.
>>
>
>I've never seen anything from you that struck me as anything but dull,
>repetitive and on an intellectual level with grade-school kids
>discovering their first dirty words.
>
>Pretending that anybody who finds you dull and stupid is, in reality,
>part of a conspiracy of dunces who ostracize you because they know you
>are SO SUPERIOR, is a pretty useful formula for a loser who can't deal
>with their utter inability to deal with people.
>
>--
>Zapanaz
>International Satanic Conspiracy
>Customer Support Specialist
>http://joecosby.com/
>"Kilgore Trout once wrote a short story which was a dialogue between
>two
>pieces of yeast. They were discussing the possible purposes of life as
>they ate sugar and suffocated in their own excrement. But because of
>their limited perspective, they never came close to guessing they were
>making champagne."
>-- Kurt Vonnegut
>
Somehow, I don't think that you're making champagne.
Correspondent:: Semolina Pilchard Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:53:58 +0000
--------
On 21 Jan 2005 01:43:59 -0800, joecosby@mindspring.com wrote:
>The other person referred to people who crossposted as immature. It
>makes no sense to interpret that as having anything to do with
>"content".
Why ever not, Joe, my sweetie? Do go on and explain yourself -
hopefully with a modicum of coherence, this time.
>
>That is not an uncommon line of bullshit though among those who take
>their newsgroup way too seriously and reply to any intrusion to it as
>they would to being violently raped.
I remember your intrusions, Joe. It wasn't like being raped, which
would have been infinitely preferable. It was like a life sentence
stuck in a cell with a pretentious cunt who is utterly out of his
depth but won't shut up because he's too stupid to realise it.
>I've never seen anything from you that struck me as anything but dull,
>repetitive and on an intellectual level with grade-school kids
>discovering their first dirty words.
That's fine, Joe. You can fuck off, then. It's not like we *want*
you, you drivelling buffoon.
>
>Pretending that anybody who finds you dull and stupid is, in reality,
>part of a conspiracy of dunces who ostracize you because they know you
>are SO SUPERIOR, is a pretty useful formula for a loser who can't deal
>with their utter inability to deal with people.
I'm sorry to have to say this, Joe, but you *are* dull and stupid,
yes, you're a dunce and a pretentious and embarrassing one at that.
alt. tasteless doesn't like you, alt.slack doesn't like you -
regardless of whatever other disagreements people may have they
immediately unite in their revulsion of you.
But I like you, Joe, 'cause you're stupid, easy to provoke and utterly
predictable. You're a perfect victim. Go and wipe your nose.
--
Sem
"Semolina Pilchard" wrote in message
news:dkq1v09s84i27it996fr82fdd5cq229rk2@4ax.com...
> On 21 Jan 2005 01:43:59 -0800, joecosby@mindspring.com wrote:
> stuck in a cell with a pretentious cunt who is utterly out of his
> depth but won't shut up because he's too stupid to realise it.
That's it!!! I was racking my brains trying to think of what it was you
reminded me of....thanks!
Correspondent:: E Varden Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:39:21 -0500
--------
Zapanaz wrote:
>
> yeah it's a shame that you would have to put up with people who can't
> live up to the high standards of conduct inherent in a newsgroup
> devoted to being tasteless.
Hey Zapruder! Maybe take a moment to ponder the difference between
"tasteless" and "stupid", or being a simple boring pain-in-the-ass...
Pe
Correspondent:: Zapanaz Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:22:11 -0800
--------
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:39:21 -0500, E Varden wrote:
>Zapanaz wrote:
>
>>
>> yeah it's a shame that you would have to put up with people who can't
>> live up to the high standards of conduct inherent in a newsgroup
>> devoted to being tasteless.
>
>Hey Zapruder! Maybe take a moment to ponder the difference between
>"tasteless" and "stupid", or being a simple boring pain-in-the-ass...
Exactly.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Work is of two kinds: first, altering the position of matter at or near
the earth's surface relatively to other such matter; second, telling
other people to do so. The first kind is unpleasant and ill paid; the
second is pleasant and highly paid.