Subject: Female

From: anders@mercury.interpath.net (Pat Anders)

Now that I've got your attention...

So saturday night I go out with a friend to see some band another friend
of mine who reviews music for the local Pink liberal weekly free rag
thinks highly of, only they turn out not to be the best new country band
in North Carolina (that's still Pine State), but just another miserable
country rock bar band. Ross Grady don't know shit about country music.

Well, we got up and walked out when we saw what a lousy show we were in
for, zoomed down to the videorama to rent a flick, and let me tell you,
friends, I'M GLAD THOSE PECKERWOODS TURNED OUT TO BE SUCH A HORRIBLE
EXCUSE FOR COUNTRY MUSIC. I'M GLAD SHE WON THE ARGUMENT OVER WHAT WE
WERE GONNA RENT, even if I didn't get to see "The 5000 Fingers of
Dr. T".

We rented "Female", an MGM production about some Pink woman right out of
an Ayn Rand novel who runs this auto company that controls 17% of the
nation's market. On the side, she looks for love, using 'em and tossing
the bones aside when she's through. But she's not happy, see, because
they're all a bunch of glorps out for her money. Until she meets this
pipe-smoking engineer played by none other than J. R. "Bob" Dobbs!

That's right, "Bob" turned her on by ignoring her. In the end, of course,
they did the nasty thing and she was so damned impressed she gave him the
nation's second largest car manufacturing company lock, stock and barrel.
And all the time, he was diddling his secretary on the side.

Visual highlight: the scene where "Bob" serenades the pink heroine with
his trusty banjo in a rowboat.

This film did raise some questions. It was apparently made in 1933. This
is well before Dobbs' film career is supposed to have begun. Could the
copyright date have been changed for security reasons? Or could it be
that "Bob" is simply ageless? He looked to be about forty in this film,
which would mean he's around 100 years old now, but still lookin' fresh.

I favor this second explanation.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Female
From: s009aeh@discover.wright.edu (ANDREW HERMETZ)

Pat Anders (anders@mercury.interpath.net) wrote:
> Now that I've got your attention...
> This film did raise some questions. It was apparently made in 1933. This
> is well before Dobbs' film career is supposed to have begun. Could the
> copyright date have been changed for security reasons? Or could it be
> that "Bob" is simply ageless? He looked to be about forty in this film,
> which would mean he's around 100 years old now, but still lookin' fresh.
> I favor this second explanation.

I thought "Bob" was supranatural -- a force of Nature, like gravity --
and so had been created along with everything else in the Universe at the
Big Bang (or is that Big Bob...uhm?) As I understand it He is so powerful
because he is composed entirely of "Bobyons". Cool, eh?
Little known fact: if you get far enough in the study of Quantum
Physics, you will eventually learn that "Bobyons" may actually be the
most elementary particle in the Universe. Stephen Hawking's "A Brief
History of Time" reveils this fact in a complex code so as not to scare
the Pinks.

Relatively yours, mine, and ours,

God (AKA The Supreme Being or Anti-Pope Andrew)
<Lover/Thinker/Student/Collector of Strange Facts & Tidbits>
I'm fully capable of speaking for myself -- so fuck off.

"Sex with a Male or Female Subgenii can cause you to experience
Nirvana (the State of Being, not the band!) ...or Death!"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Female
From: dynasor@infi.net (Dennis McClain-Furmanski)

Bobyons are indeed fundamental particles of non-matter waves.
Their charge transfer quanta is the slackion. These and their symetric
counter-part, the anit-slackion, take turns moving backwards and forwards in
time, keeping the universe sewed together.

Richard Feynman, a SubG infiltrator into the CON's science structure (a safe
cracking, bongo playing Yetisyn physicist), postulated that there was only
one electron, moving back and forth in time, allowing us to 'see' lots of
them. But he never got as far as to understand that it was bouncing back and
forth like that from boiging off the slackion flux.

You want to see something freaky? Draw a pipe in on a picture of Hawking.

dynasor@infi.net The Doctor is on.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Up one level
Back to document index

Original file name: Female

This file was converted with TextToHTML - (c) Logic n.v.