Now I find I have these irresistable urges to treat it like the latest
re-incarnation of net.suicide (the previous being news.groups, but I
resisted that urge and just stayed away as much as possible.)
Can these people even qualify as air-heads? I doubt it, but somehow I
can't stop reading, a morbid fascination with the chartreuse painted
effluvia that seeps from people's minds keeps me white-knuckled and
staring at the screen, like the perverse urge to watch a Friday the
13th movie through to the end just to see what depths of depravity
will be reached before it's over (but net groups never end...!)
Lest I be misunderstood, a few samples that raise a cold sweat as I
restrain myself from providing not the answers they want, but the
answers they deserve...
>> OK gang, I've heard of phone sex/domination and mail domination,
>>how about computer domination?
>
>Sounds like a neat idea, but in the interest of "equal time" and
>variety, shouldn't there be a compu-dominatrix side-by-side your
>operation?
>Sometimes I think intelligence is over rated, mainly because
>smart people seem to be assholes just as often as stupid people.
(Pop reading comprehension quiz: are the following two people talking
to each other? The text is clipped verbatim!)
>Recreational sex is fun, but it runs second place to "making love".
>That is why we look for our soulmate, and why we get married.
>
>>long dicks are, and how much they're liked by women, etc, that what
>>matters is how long it lasts (length of TIME).
> I am not the type who must disassociate my penis from myself. Actually,
> the more I think about it, the more silly I think it is to be embarrased.
> I think it is just one of those silly ideas that society has brainwashed
> us into believing.
(No! It can be mathematically proven!)
My nomination for first prize for "Speculations on Reality"...
>With regard to a woman's attractiveness as related to speech, I think there
>have been female film stars that have become *more* popular because of a lisp
>or other speech impediment (but please don't call on me to identify them, 'cause
>I'm sure I couldn't).
>
>> "If she smokes, she fucks."
>
>That makes about as much sense as,
>
> "If she eats, she fucks."
(actually clipped out of an article that tries to argue with these
premises...)
Ok, here's a later argument to the above premise...
>Either of you go to Catholic school as childred?
--------------------
So tell me, would it really be like kicking puppies down the stairs,
or should my pride restrain me because it's just too easy?
-B
