Rev. Ivan Stang wrote:
>
> In article <8cs9l1$gk7$1@thingy.apana.org.au>, David Gerard
> <fun@thingy.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> > A historical question for Rev. Ivan Stang: where did the stuff about the
> > 'foot gland' first come from? What set you off writing about it in the
> > Book?
> >
> > (I ask because I may have IMPORTANT revelations on the subject, and I want
> > to be sure they'll be plausible to the marks.)
>
> Dobbs had been talking about the foot being the "seat" of the soul
> since as long as I know about. No pun intended on the word "sole". Dr.
> Drummond described the glandular nature of the foot in ON THE ROAD tape
> #3, July 1980 I believe.
>
There is some confusion, I believe, as to whether an individual who
has lost his feet, or even a foot, or perhaps even suffers excessively
from foot fungus can be ShortDurMar'd; in that they would be unable
to properly consummate their ShortDurMar. Especially if their
remaining foot or stumps was *really* stinky.
I am waiting for the encyclical on the subject. Personally, I am
of the bent that a stinky stump can be very erotic.
Original file name: Foot Gland
This file was converted with TextToHTML - (c) Logic n.v.